Goss v. Beilfuss et al
DECISION AND ORDER signed by Judge Rudolph T Randa on 7/6/06 denying 2 petitioner's Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order. (cc: all counsel) (Randa, Rudolph T)
Goss v. Beilfuss et al
Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
S P E C I A L I S T PHILLIP M. GOSS, P e titio n e r , v. C O M M A N D IN G OFFICER CAPTAIN MATTHEW P. BEILFUSS 1 s t Battalion, 121st Field Artillery Wisconsin National Guard, S E C R E T A R Y OF THE ARMY R e s p o n d e n t s. C a s e No. 06-C-0737
DECISION AND ORDER
O n July 5, 2006, the petitioner, Specialist Phillip M. Goss ("Goss"), filed motions for a temporary restraining order, preliminary injunction, and habeas relief. In his motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction, Goss argues that he should be m a in ta in e d in the Wisconsin National Guard and exempted from deployment, or discharged, b e c au s e (1) he is physically unable to perform the duties required of active soldiers in the M id d le East; (2) his assignment to active duty was unlawful because he did not request a tra n sf e r to active status; (3) he was denied access to a physical evaluation board; and (4) the W is c o n s in Guard failed to permit him access to separation processes as prescribed by Army re g u la tio n s .
Page 2 of 2
T h e Court has considered Goss's motion for a temporary restraining order, the a f f id a v it and brief provided in support thereof, and the habeas petition underlying his actiont. A f ter examining those materials, the Court finds that Goss has failed to satisfy the criteria f o r issuance of a temporary restraining order pursuant to Rule 65 of the Federal Rules of C iv il Procedure. NOW, THEREFORE, BASED ON THE FOREGOING, IT IS HEREBY O R D E R E D THAT: G o s s 's Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order is DENIED. Dated at Milwaukee, Wisconsin this 6th day of July, 2006. BY THE COURT: s /R u d o l p h T. Randa HON. RUDOLPH T. RANDA C h ie f Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?