Owens v. Conley et al
Filing
440
ORDER signed by Judge Lynn Adelman on 1/3/17 that the following motions are DENIED without prejudice but may be renewed by the parties if they remain unresolved: Case No. 07-CV-0303, ECF Nos. 453, 456, 461, 484 & 494; Case No. 07-CV-0441, ECF Nos. 3 93, 396, 401, 423 & 434; Case No. 10-CV-0075, ECF Nos. 317, 320, 325, 348 & 358. Further ordering that the following motions to withdraw prior motions are GRANTED: Case No. 07-CV-0303, ECF Nos. 498 & 499; Case No. 07-CV-0441, ECF Nos. 438 & 439; Case No. 10-CV-0075, ECF Nos. 362 & 363. (cc: all counsel) (dm)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
GLENN BURTON, JR,
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No. 7-CV-303
AMERICAN CYANAMID CO, et al.,
Defendants;
RAVON OWENS,
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No. 7-CV-441
AMERICAN CYANAMID CO, et al.,
Defendants;
CESAR SIFUENTES,
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No. 10-CV-75
AMERICAN CYANAMID CO, et al.,
Defendants.
ORDER
Several motions in the above-captioned cases appear to be moot. I will deny
these motions without prejudice, but the parties may renew them, if they remain
unresolved. Further, plaintiffs and various defendants filed motions to withdraw prior
motions raising issues that the parties have resolved. I will grant these motions.
THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the following motions are DENIED without
prejudice but may be renewed by the parties if they remain unresolved:
•
•
•
Case No. 07-CV-0303, ECF Nos. 453, 456, 461, 484 & 494
Case No. 07-CV-0441, ECF Nos. 393, 396, 401, 423 & 434
Case No. 10-CV-0075, ECF Nos. 317, 320, 325, 348 & 358
1
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the following motions to withdraw prior motions
are GRANTED:
•
•
•
Case No. 07-CV-0303, ECF Nos. 498 & 499
Case No. 07-CV-0441, ECF Nos. 438 & 439
Case No. 10-CV-0075, ECF Nos. 362 & 363
Dated at Milwaukee, Wisconsin, this 3rd day of January, 2017.
s/ Lynn Adelman
__________________________________
LYNN ADELMAN
District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?