Owens v. Conley et al

Filing 440

ORDER signed by Judge Lynn Adelman on 1/3/17 that the following motions are DENIED without prejudice but may be renewed by the parties if they remain unresolved: Case No. 07-CV-0303, ECF Nos. 453, 456, 461, 484 & 494; Case No. 07-CV-0441, ECF Nos. 3 93, 396, 401, 423 & 434; Case No. 10-CV-0075, ECF Nos. 317, 320, 325, 348 & 358. Further ordering that the following motions to withdraw prior motions are GRANTED: Case No. 07-CV-0303, ECF Nos. 498 & 499; Case No. 07-CV-0441, ECF Nos. 438 & 439; Case No. 10-CV-0075, ECF Nos. 362 & 363. (cc: all counsel) (dm)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN GLENN BURTON, JR, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 7-CV-303 AMERICAN CYANAMID CO, et al., Defendants; RAVON OWENS, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 7-CV-441 AMERICAN CYANAMID CO, et al., Defendants; CESAR SIFUENTES, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 10-CV-75 AMERICAN CYANAMID CO, et al., Defendants. ORDER Several motions in the above-captioned cases appear to be moot. I will deny these motions without prejudice, but the parties may renew them, if they remain unresolved. Further, plaintiffs and various defendants filed motions to withdraw prior motions raising issues that the parties have resolved. I will grant these motions. THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the following motions are DENIED without prejudice but may be renewed by the parties if they remain unresolved: • • • Case No. 07-CV-0303, ECF Nos. 453, 456, 461, 484 & 494 Case No. 07-CV-0441, ECF Nos. 393, 396, 401, 423 & 434 Case No. 10-CV-0075, ECF Nos. 317, 320, 325, 348 & 358 1 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the following motions to withdraw prior motions are GRANTED: • • • Case No. 07-CV-0303, ECF Nos. 498 & 499 Case No. 07-CV-0441, ECF Nos. 438 & 439 Case No. 10-CV-0075, ECF Nos. 362 & 363 Dated at Milwaukee, Wisconsin, this 3rd day of January, 2017. s/ Lynn Adelman __________________________________ LYNN ADELMAN District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?