Johnson v. Strasser

Filing 54

ORDER signed by Judge Lynn Adelman on 3/28/11 denying 52 Motion for Reconsideration. (cc: all counsel, via USPS to plaintiff) (dm)

Download PDF
Johnson v. Strasser Doc. 54 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN STEVEN JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. STEVEN STRASSER, Defendant. Case No. 09C0222 ORDER Plaintiff Steven Johnson moves under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e) for reconsideration of my order granting summary judgment to defendant Steven Strasser, an officer with the Milwaukee Police Department. Plaintiff claimed that defendant wrongfully arrested him, but I found that this claim failed as a matter of law because plaintiff had two valid open warrants for his arrest at the time, Mark v. Furay, 769 F.2d 1266, 1268-1269 (7th Cir. 1985), and because collateral estoppel prevents him from re-litigating the state court finding that probable cause existed to arrest him. See Allen v. McCurry, 449 U.S. 90, 104-05 (1980); Guenther v. Holmgreen, 738 F.2d 879, 883-84 (7th Cir. 1984). Plaintiff argues that it was error to consider the warrants because they were not brought before the state court during a suppression hearing. However, the exhibits attached to plaintiff's complaint show that the warrants were in fact brought to the court's attention. (Compl. Ex. A.) Plaintiff further argues that during the state court criminal proceedings the State failed to adequately respond to his motion to suppress evidence and therefore defendant has stipulated that there were no open warrants nor probable cause to arrest him. This argument is totally without merit and serves to only suggest that the Dockets.Justia.com wrongful arrest claim implicates the validity of his conviction and is therefore barred by Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994). Thus even assuming for the sake of argument that plaintiff is not collaterally estopped by the state court finding of probable cause, it is clear that his wrongful arrest claim fails. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to reconsider is DENIED. Dated at Milwaukee, Wisconsin this 28th day of March, 2011. /s_______________________________ LYNN ADELMAN District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?