McGee v. Dinsmore

Filing 5

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL signed by Judge J P Stadtmueller on 2/26/10. (cc: appellant, all counsel)(nm)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN ____________________________________________ E D W A R D MCGEE, Appellant, v. S H E R R IE D. DINSMORE, Appellee. ____________________________________________ C a s e No. 09-CV-1107 ORDER A p p e lla n t Edward McGee ("McGee") filed this appeal from an order entered b y United States Bankruptcy Judge Pamela Pepper on September 21, 2009. In the o rd e r, Judge Pepper granted Appellee Sherrie Dinsmore's ("Dinsmore") motion to d is m is s McGee's adversary action. Dinsmore had filed for bankruptcy in January 2 0 0 9 and McGee sought to have two civil judgments against Dinsmore excepted fro m discharge. McGee filed a notice of appeal of Judge Pepper's dismissal of his a c tio n more than one month later, on October 30, 2009. McGee's appeal was u n tim e ly filed under the applicable bankruptcy rule and this court lacks jurisdiction o ve r it. Therefore, the court must dismiss McGee's action. A n appeal from a judgment, order, or decree of a bankruptcy judge to a district c o u rt must be taken within the time limits provided by Federal Bankruptcy Rule of P ro c e d u r e 8002. Under this rule, an appeal from a bankruptcy court decision must b e filed within 14 days of the date of entry of the order at issue. Fed. R. Bank. P. 8 0 0 2 (a ). An appeal which is filed more than 14 days after entry of the order cannot b e reviewed by the district court because the court lacks jurisdiction over the matter. S e e In re Maurice, 69 F.3d 830, 832 (7th Cir. 1995) (stating that a late-filed notice o f appeal puts the challenged bankruptcy order outside a district judge's power to re vie w ); see also Stelpflug v. Fed. Lank Bank of St. Paul, 790 F.2d 47, 49 (7th Cir. 1 9 8 6 ) (stating that the requirement of a timely notice of appeal from an order of the b a n k ru p tc y court is "mandatory and jurisdictional."). In his appellate brief, McGee outlines the financial ruin he has suffered b e c a u s e of Dinsmore's actions and notes that state courts granted judgment in his fa vo r on two small claims actions. Unfortunately, these circumstances do not c h a n g e the fact that his notice of appeal was untimely filed. There is no question th a t McGee filed his notice more than 14 days after entry of Judge Pepper's d is m is s a l order. The order was entered on September 22, 2009, during a hearing a t which McGee was present. (See McGee v. Dinsmore, Case No. 09-02169-pp, D k # 1 6 ). However, McGee did not file his notice of appeal until 38 days later, on O c to b e r 30, 2009. Consequently, the court lacks jurisdiction over the untimely a p p e a l and must dismiss the action. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that this appeal be and the same is hereby DISMISSED. T h e clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly. D a te d at Milwaukee, W is c o n s in , this 26th day of February, 2010. BY THE COURT: J .P . Stadtmueller U .S . District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?