Bates v. Friedell et al

Filing 102

ORDER signed by Judge Lynn Adelman on 8/17/13 that this action be dismissed with prejudice for lack of prosecution effective Friday, 9/6/2013, unless plaintiff responds to defendants motion or establishes just cause for his failure to respond to said motion as required. (cc: all counsel, via USPS to plaintiff)(dm)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
CRAIG THOMAS BATES,
Plaintiff,
v.

Case No. 10-C-00576

NURSE JANE DOE, and
DR. STEPHEN A. CULLINAN,
Defendants.

ORDER
In an Order entered June 11, 2013, I directed plaintiff to file his response to
defendant’s motion for summary judgment on or before August 9, 2013. No response has
been filed to date.
THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that this action be dismissed with prejudice for lack
of prosecution effective Friday, September 6, 2013, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 41(c)
(E.D. Wis.) (copy attached) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b), unless prior to that
date plaintiff responds to defendant’s motion or establishes just cause for his failure to
respond to said motion as required.
Dated at Milwaukee, Wisconsin, this 17th day of August, 2013.

s/ Lynn Adelman
_______________________
LYNN ADELMAN
District Judge

Civil Local Rule 41(c)
Dismissal for Lack of Diligence
Whenever it appears to the Court that the plaintiff is not diligently prosecuting
the action, the Court may enter an order of dismissal with or without prejudice.
Any affected party may petition for reinstatement of the action within 21 days.

2