Gronik et al v. Balthasar et al

Filing 211

ORDER signed by Judge Lynn Adelman on 10/23/12 DENYING 210 Letter request. See order. (cc: all counsel)(dm)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN DAVID S. GRONIK, JR., et al., Plaintiffs, v. Case No. 10-CV-954 SUSAN BALTHASAR, et al., Defendants, and SHOREWEST REALTORS, INC., CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY, and ANNE SCHWARTZ, Third-Party Defendants, and OPIO BOAT MOON, LLC, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Case No. 11-CV-697 CHUBB INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. ORDER The Balthasars, defendants in this case, have filed a letter asking this court to enter an order compelling Time Warner Cable to respond to a subpoena for a deposition. The proper procedure when a party refuses to comply with a subpoena is to file a motion to compel under Fed. R. Civ. P. 37 explaining why it is necessary for the court to enter an order compelling discovery. Along with the motion to compel, movant must also file “a certification that the movant has in good faith conferred or attempted to confer with the person or party failing to make disclosure or discovery in an effort to obtain it without court action.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(a)(1). THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the Balthasars’ request for an order compelling Time Warner Cable to respond to the subpoena [DOCKET #210] is DENIED. Dated at Milwaukee, Wisconsin, this 23rd day of October 2012. s/ Lynn Adelman _______________________ LYNN ADELMAN District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?