Herr et al v. Linde Inc

Filing 34

ORDER signed by Judge Rudolph T. Randa on 4/24/2015 GRANTING 32 Plaintiff's Request to the following extent: if 29 plaintiff's motion to strike is denied, plaintiff's response to 22 defendant's motion for summary judgment will be due 21 days after ruling on motion to strike; defendant's reply will be due within time frame allotted under local rules. (cc: all counsel)(cb)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
JANICE J. HERR, individually and as
Special Administrator on behalf of the
Estate of Richard J. Herr, Deceased,
Plaintiff,
-vs-

Case No. 10-C-1114

LINDE LLC, et al.,
Defendant.
DECISION AND ORDER
Before the Court is the plaintiff’s request for a ruling on her objection
to the defendant’s motion for summary judgment, or in the alternative, for
leave for additional time to respond to the motion pending a ruling on the
motion to strike. Plaintiff’s motion/request [ECF No. 32] is GRANTED to the
following extent: if the motion to strike is denied, plaintiff’s response to the
motion for summary judgment would be due twenty-one (21) days after the
Court’s ruling on the motion to strike. Defendant’s reply would be due within
the timeframe allotted under the local rules. Civil L.R. 56(b)(3) (E.D. Wis.).
Dated at Milwaukee, Wisconsin, this 24th day of April, 2015.

SO ORDERED:
__________________________
HON. RUDOLPH T. RANDA
U.S. District Judge