Herr et al v. Linde Inc

Filing 34

ORDER signed by Judge Rudolph T. Randa on 4/24/2015 GRANTING 32 Plaintiff's Request to the following extent: if 29 plaintiff's motion to strike is denied, plaintiff's response to 22 defendant's motion for summary judgment will be due 21 days after ruling on motion to strike; defendant's reply will be due within time frame allotted under local rules. (cc: all counsel)(cb)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN JANICE J. HERR, individually and as Special Administrator on behalf of the Estate of Richard J. Herr, Deceased, Plaintiff, -vs- Case No. 10-C-1114 LINDE LLC, et al., Defendant. DECISION AND ORDER Before the Court is the plaintiff’s request for a ruling on her objection to the defendant’s motion for summary judgment, or in the alternative, for leave for additional time to respond to the motion pending a ruling on the motion to strike. Plaintiff’s motion/request [ECF No. 32] is GRANTED to the following extent: if the motion to strike is denied, plaintiff’s response to the motion for summary judgment would be due twenty-one (21) days after the Court’s ruling on the motion to strike. Defendant’s reply would be due within the timeframe allotted under the local rules. Civil L.R. 56(b)(3) (E.D. Wis.). Dated at Milwaukee, Wisconsin, this 24th day of April, 2015. SO ORDERED: __________________________ HON. RUDOLPH T. RANDA U.S. District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?