Herr et al v. Linde Inc

Filing 35

ORDER signed by Judge Rudolph T. Randa on 7/31/2015 DENYING 29 Plaintiff's Motion to Strike. Parties to address citizenship of defendant when briefing summary judgment motion. (cc: all counsel) (cb)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN JANICE J. HERR, individually and as Special Administrator on behalf of THE ESTATE OF RICHARD J. HERR, Deceased, Plaintiff, -vs- Case No. 10-C-1114 LINDE LLC, improperly sued as Linde, Inc., f/k/a the BOC Group, Inc. and/or Airco, Inc., Defendant. DECISION AND ORDER The plaintiff, Janice Herr, moves to strike the motion for summary judgment filed by the remaining defendant in this case, Linde, LLC, formerly known as the BOC Group, Inc.. Herr argues that the motion is untimely pursuant to the scheduling order established by the MDL court. Even so, the Court would prefer to address the merits of the defendant’s arguments instead of conducting a trial that is potentially unnecessary. Therefore, the motion to strike [ECF No. 29] is DENIED. The Court also notes some confusion over the citizenship of the defendant. This matter was removed from state court and subsequently transferred to the Eastern District of Pennsylvania for consolidated pretrial proceedings, MDL Docket No. 875. Subject matter jurisdiction is premised upon diversity of citizenship, 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a), and the citizenship of a limited liability company is the citizenship of each of its members. Thomas v. Guardsmark, LLC, 487 F.3d 531, 534 (7th Cir. 2007). Before proceeding to resolution, the Court must be assured that none of the defendant’s members are Wisconsin citizens. The parties should address this issue in the briefing that flows from the pending motion for summary judgment. See ECF No. 34. Dated at Milwaukee, Wisconsin, this 31st day of July, 2015. SO ORDERED: __________________________ HON. RUDOLPH T. RANDA U.S. District Judge -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?