Jackson v Hoftiezer et al

Filing 101

ORDER signed by Judge Lynn Adelman on 5/20/13 that plaintiffs request for specific work schedule of specific employees 100 is DENIED. Further ordering that plaintiff may supplement his response to the defendants motion for summary judgment and/or file his own motion for summary judgment by Monday, June 10, 2013. (cc: all counsel, via USPS to plaintiff)(dm)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
KEITH JACKSON,
Plaintiff,
v.

Case No. 12-CV-00058

DR. SCOTT HOFTIEZER, et al.,
Defendants.

ORDER
I am in receipt of plaintiff’s letter dated May 3, 2013. He attached a copy of his
earlier motion to compel and the nursing schedules he received from defendants. Plaintiff
suggests that what defendants provided is not recognizable or comprehensible. He asks
for a time schedule with “regular times and numbers” and states that he needs this for
summary judgment and for trial. However, as indicated in my April 2, 2013 order, discovery
is closed and I will not allow plaintiff to serve additional discovery requests after the
discovery deadline. I will, however, provide plaintiff with an extension of the deadline for
him to supplement his response to defendants’ motion for summary judgment in case he
has been waiting to hear from the court before preparing his response.
THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff’s request for specific work schedule of
specific employees (Docket #100) is DENIED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that on or before Monday, June 10, 2013, plaintiff may
supplement his response to the defendants’ motion for summary judgment and/or file his
own motion for summary judgment. Defendants’ deadlines to reply and/or respond will be
based on Civil Local Rule 56(b) (E.D. Wis.).

Dated at Milwaukee, Wisconsin, this 20th day of May 2013.

s/ Lynn Adelman
_______________________
LYNN ADELMAN
District Judge

2