Ullico Casualty Company et al v. Matthiesen Wickert and Lehrer SC
ORDER signed by Judge Lynn Adelman on 1/23/13 denying without prejudice 11 Motion for Preliminary Injunction; 15 Motion to Dismiss; 16 Motion to Stay. (cc: all counsel) (dm)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
ULLICO CASUALTY COMPANY and
PATRIOT NATIONAL INSURANCE GROUP,
Case No. 12-C-1031
MATTHIESEN, WICKERT and LEHRER, S.C.,
DECISION AND ORDER
Currently before me are the following motions: plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary
injunction, defendant’s motion to stay this case on abstention grounds, and defendant’s
motion to dismiss the second count of the complaint for failure to state a claim upon which
relief can be granted. It appears that, while the parties were briefing these motions, certain
events transpired that makes it unnecessary for me to decide the motions at this time.
First, the defendant represented to the court that it has no intention of disbursing the
disputed funds from its trust account unless a court orders it to do so or its dispute with the
plaintiffs is resolved. See Aff. of Gary Wickert ¶ 36. Thus, plaintiffs no longer have a need
for an order enjoining the defendant from transferring funds out of its trust account.
Second, the Texas state-court litigation has been removed to federal court in Texas, and
the defendant agrees that so long as the Texas litigation remains in federal court, I cannot
abstain from exercising jurisdiction in this case. See Def.’s Reply Br. at 2. Accordingly,
I will deny the motion for preliminary injunction and motion for abstention without prejudice.
Because the motion to dismiss is intertwined with the motion for abstention, it will also be
denied without prejudice. The parties may refile any these motions if the need arises—i.e.,
if the defendant threatens to transfer the disputed funds from its trust account or the Texas
litigation is remanded to state court.
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction is
DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendant’s motion to stay this case on abstention
grounds is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
FINALLY, IT IS ORDERED that defendant’s motion to dismiss the second count of
the complaint is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
Dated at Milwaukee, Wisconsin, this 23rd day of January, 2013.
s/ Lynn Adelman
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?