Tissue Technology LLC et al v. TAK Investments LLC

Filing 28

ORDER re 26 Order to Show Cause on Jurisdictional Issue, signed by Chief Judge William C Griesbach on 11/27/2013. The case may proceed, and Plaintiffs unopposed stipulation 25 for extension of time to file its summary judgment response brief is granted. (ECF No. 25.) Plaintiffs brief in response to Defendants motion for summary judgment will be due on December 2, 2013. (cc: all counsel)(Griesbach, William)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN TISSUE TECHNOLOGY LLC, PARTNERS CONCEPTS DEVELOPMENT INC., TISSUE PRODUCTS TECHNOLOGY CORP., and OCONTO FALLS TISSUE INC., Plaintiffs, v. Case No. 12-C-1305 TAK INVESTMENTS LLC, Defendants. ORDER On November 12, 2013, the court issued an order to show cause directing Plaintiff Tissue Technology, LLC, to explain why this case should not be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. (ECF No. 26.) Tissue Technology, a Wisconsin Limited Liability Company, had failed to previously disclose the citizenship of each of its members. Tissue Technology responded on November 18, 2013, indicating that its members are citizens of Wisconsin and Illinois. (ECF No. 27.) Defendant TAK Investments previously disclosed that it is a Delaware Limited Liability Company and its members are citizens of Florida and Maryland. (Countercl., ¶ 1, ECF No. 14.) Since the members of Tissue Technology and TAK Investments are citizens of different states, complete diversity exists and the court has jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332. The case may proceed, and Plaintiffs’ unopposed stipulation for extension of time to file its summary judgment response brief is granted. (ECF No. 25.) Plaintiffs’ brief in response to Defendant’s motion for summary judgment will be due on December 2, 2013. Dated this 27th day of November, 2013. s/ William C. Griesbach William C. Griesbach, Chief Judge United States District Court

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?