Peete v. Thomas et al

Filing 27

ORDER DENYING 26 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Christopher Czarphino Peete, signed by Chief Judge William C Griesbach on 11/18/2013. (cc: all counsel)(Griesbach, William)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

CHRISTOPHER CZARPHINO PEETE,
Plaintiff,
v.

Case No. 13-C-587

TIM THOMAS, et al.,
Defendants.

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Plaintiff has filed a Motion for Summary Judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules
of Civil Procedure. The motion will be denied. It cites to no evidentiary materials that establish
the undisputed facts necessary to entitle plaintiff to relief. Summary Judgment is not simply an
argument that a Plaintiff should win. It requires the plaintiff to establish that the undisputed
material facts of the case entitle him to judgment as a matter of law. Plaintiff has failed to set forth
facts on this record in a form that would require a response by the defendants. Accordingly, the
motion is denied.
Dated this 18th

day of November, 2013.
s/ William C. Griesbach
William C. Griesbach, Chief Judge
United States District Court