Scott v. Wisconsin Secure Program Facility et al
Filing
15
ORDER that this case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to pay the filing fee signed by Judge Lynn Adelman on 1/7/14. (cc: all counsel, via USPS to plaintiff, AAG Corey Finkelmeyer, PLRA Attorney)(dm)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
MICHAEL SCOTT,
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No. 13-CV-1010
WISCONSIN SECURE PROGRAM FACILITY, et al.,
Defendants,
DECISION AND ORDER
In an order entered November 27, 2013, I denied plaintiff’s motion for leave to
proceed in forma pauperis because he has three or more “strikes” under § 1915(g) and his
complaint did not allege “imminent danger of serious physical injury.” I directed plaintiff to
forward the sum of $400.00 to the Clerk of Court as the full filing fee in this case and
warned him that failure to comply would result in dismissal of this case.
Plaintiff has not paid the full filing fee. Instead, he wrote a letter to the Clerk of Court
stating that he is indigent and unable to pay the $400.00 filing fee. He requested that the
court still allow him to proceed with his lawsuit. There is no basis for granting his request.
Because plaintiff has accumulated three or more “strikes,” he must pay the full filing fee to
proceed.
THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED WITHOUT
PREJUDICE for failure to pay the filing fee.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that copies of this order be sent to the warden of the
institution where plaintiff is confined, to Corey F. Finkelmeyer, Assistant Attorney General,
Wisconsin Department of Justice, P.O. Box 7857, Madison, Wisconsin 53707-7857, and
to PLRA Attorney, United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, 219 S. Dearborn
Street, Rm. 2722, Chicago, Illinois 60604.
Dated at Milwaukee, Wisconsin, this 7th day of January 2014.
s/ Lynn Adelman
_______________________
LYNN ADELMAN
District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?