Lomenzo et al v. BL Imaging Inc et al

Filing 13

ORDER signed by Judge Rudolph T. Randa on 8/8/2014. Plaintiffs to file appropriate motion for default judgment within 10 days of the date of this Order. (cc: all counsel, via US mail to Steven Muckerheide)(cb)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN ANDREW LOMENZO, CARRIE JACKSON-ARDILA, ERIN MADDOX, and MITCHELL RASQUE, Plaintiffs -vs- Case No. 14-C-138 BL IMAGING, Inc. d/b/a BACKLOT IMAGING, and STEVEN MUCKERHEIDE, Defendants. DECISION AND ORDER In this action under the Fair Labor Standards Act, the plaintiffs simultaneously moved for entry of default and default judgment, which is not the correct procedure. Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a), 55(b). Nonetheless, the Clerk of Court correctly entered default against BL Imaging, Inc. The plaintiffs should file an appropriate motion for default judgment within ten (10) days of the date of this Order. See Domanus v. Lewicki, 742 F.3d 290, 303 (7th Cir. 2014), explaining that while a default judgment “conclusively establishes liability, the victor must still prove up damages. Any allegations in the complaint relating to liability are considered true, but allegations going to damages are not.” Dated at Milwaukee, Wisconsin, this 8th day of August, 2014. SO ORDERED: __________________________ HON. RUDOLPH T. RANDA U.S. District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?