Moreno v. Holder et al

Filing 13

ORDER signed by Judge Lynn Adelman on 7/19/14 that if the plaintiffs do not take some action to prosecute this case, such as filing a motion for additional time to serve the United States attorneys office, on or before July 28, 2014, the court will consider this case abandoned and dismiss it without prejudice for lack of prosecution. (cc: all counsel)(dm)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN ASHLEIGH MORENO and CESAR MORENO GARCIA, Plaintiffs, v. Case No. 14-C-0223 ERIC HOLDER, et al., Defendants. ORDER The plaintiffs commenced this action by filing a complaint on March 3, 2014. The defendants are agencies, officers and employees of the United States, which means that service of process must be done in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(i). Plaintiffs filed proofs of service indicating that they served each defendant by certified mail on April 1, 2014. On June 17, 2014, an attorney with the United States Department of Justice filed a letter on behalf of the defendants advising the court that it is the defendants’ position that they have not been properly served because the plaintiffs have not served a copy of the summons and complaint on the United States attorney’s office for this district, as required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(i)(1)(A). To date, the plaintiffs have not responded to this letter or otherwise taken any action to prosecute this case. IT IS ORDERED that if the plaintiffs do not take some action to prosecute this case, such as filing a motion for additional time to serve the United States attorney’s office, on or before July 28, 2014, the court will consider this case abandoned and dismiss it without prejudice for lack of prosecution. Dated at Milwaukee, Wisconsin, this 19th day of July, 2014. s/ Lynn Adelman ____________________________________ LYNN ADELMAN District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?