Moreno v. Holder et al
Filing
13
ORDER signed by Judge Lynn Adelman on 7/19/14 that if the plaintiffs do not take some action to prosecute this case, such as filing a motion for additional time to serve the United States attorneys office, on or before July 28, 2014, the court will consider this case abandoned and dismiss it without prejudice for lack of prosecution. (cc: all counsel)(dm)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
ASHLEIGH MORENO and
CESAR MORENO GARCIA,
Plaintiffs,
v.
Case No. 14-C-0223
ERIC HOLDER, et al.,
Defendants.
ORDER
The plaintiffs commenced this action by filing a complaint on March 3, 2014. The
defendants are agencies, officers and employees of the United States, which means that
service of process must be done in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(i).
Plaintiffs filed proofs of service indicating that they served each defendant by certified mail
on April 1, 2014. On June 17, 2014, an attorney with the United States Department of
Justice filed a letter on behalf of the defendants advising the court that it is the defendants’
position that they have not been properly served because the plaintiffs have not served a
copy of the summons and complaint on the United States attorney’s office for this district,
as required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(i)(1)(A). To date, the plaintiffs have not
responded to this letter or otherwise taken any action to prosecute this case.
IT IS ORDERED that if the plaintiffs do not take some action to prosecute this case,
such as filing a motion for additional time to serve the United States attorney’s office, on
or before July 28, 2014, the court will consider this case abandoned and dismiss it without
prejudice for lack of prosecution.
Dated at Milwaukee, Wisconsin, this 19th day of July, 2014.
s/ Lynn Adelman
____________________________________
LYNN ADELMAN
District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?