Sanders v. Boeck et al

Filing 96

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge William E Duffin on 10/27/2015. WHEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that that the plaintiffs motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is DENIED. IT IS ALSO ORDERED that by November 10, 2015, the plaintif f shall forward to the Clerk of Court the sum of $505.00 as the full filing fee in this appeal. The plaintiff's failure to comply with this order will result in dismissal of this appeal. The payment shall be clearly identified by the case name and number assigned to this action (cc: all counsel, plaintiff, Warden)(asc)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN QUORDALIS V. SANDERS, Plaintiff, v. USDC Case No. 14-CV-293 USCA Case No. 15-2791 PETER BOECK and SCOTT M. KELAND, Defendants. ORDER On August 14, 2015, the court issued an order dismissing this action. Plaintiff Quordalis V. Sanders appealed and requested leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. On September 10, 2015, the court granted Sanders’s request. On October 27, 2015, the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals remanded the case to this court for the limited purpose of considering whether the grant of leave to proceed in forma pauperis was appropriate. The court concludes that Sanders’s request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis should have been denied. Further review of this case reveals that Sanders incurred his third “strike” under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) on June 27, 2003. As such, he may not proceed in forma pauperis on appeal unless he meets the imminent danger exception, which he does not. Sanders incurred the filing fee by filing the notice of appeal. Newlin v. Helman, 123 F.3d 429, 433-34 (7th Cir. 1997), rev’d on other grounds by, Walker v. O’Brien, 216 F.3d 626 (7th Cir. 2000) and Lee v. Clinton, 209 F.3d 1025 (7th Cir. 2000). Because the court is denying Sanders’ request to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal, he must pay the full filing fee of $505.00 within fourteen days of this order or his appeal will be dismissed. Seventh Circuit Rule 3(b); Newlin, 123 F.3d at 433-34. WHEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that that the plaintiff’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is DENIED. IT IS ALSO ORDERED that by November 10, 2015, the plaintiff shall forward to the Clerk of Court the sum of $505.00 as the full filing fee in this appeal. The plaintiff's failure to comply with this order will result in dismissal of this appeal. The payment shall be clearly identified by the case name and number assigned to this action. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that copies of this order be sent to the warden of the institution where the plaintiff is confined, and to PLRA Attorney, United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, 219 S. Dearborn Street, Rm. 2722, Chicago, Illinois 60604. 2 Dated at Milwaukee, Wisconsin this 27th day of October, 2015. WILLIAM E. DUFFIN U.S. Magistrate Judge 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?