White v. City of Racine et al
Filing 10
DECISION AND ORDER signed by Judge Pamela Pepper on 6/17/2015: The court DENIES the plaintiff's 9 Motion to Supplement his Complaint. With regard to the plaintiff's offer to dismiss the unknown uniformed officers, Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a) (1)(A) states that if a plaintiff seeks to dismiss a defendant before that defendant has filed an answer to the complaint, the defendant will be dismissed without court order. The court construes the plaintiff's June 15, 2015 motion as a motion to voluntarily dismiss the unknown uniformed officers as defendants, and they will be DISMISSED. (cc: all counsel; by US Mail to the plaintiff at Stanley Correctional Institution)(pwm)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
