Haack v. Hafemann

Filing 6

ORDER DISMISSING CASE without prejudice signed by Judge Lynn Adelman on 6/5/15. (cc: all counsel, via USPS to petitioner)(dm)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN _____________________________________________________________________ ROBERT J. HAACK, Petitioner, v. Case No. 15-cv-0144 MICHAEL HAFEMANN, Superintendent, Milwaukee House of Corrections, Respondent. _____________________________________________________________________ ORDER Petitioner Robert Haack, pro se, filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in February 2015, without the required $5.00 filing fee or a petition for leave to proceed without prepayment of the fee. The Clerk of Court sent petitioner a letter asking him to pay the filing fee or request leave to proceed without prepayment of the fee within twenty-one days. When petitioner did neither, I issued an order on April 27, 2015, warning petitioner that if he did not pay the filing fee or request leave to proceed without prepayment of the fee within twenty-one days, I may dismiss his case. As of the date of this order, petitioner has still done neither. In fact, petitioner has not submitted anything in this case since first filing his petitioner in February 2015. From his failure to pay the filing fee and respond to my order, I will infer that plaintiff no longer wishes to prosecute this action. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).1 THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice. 1 I also note that my April 27, 2015 Order, which was mailed to petitioner at the Milwaukee House of Corrections, was returned as undeliverable. See Docket #5. Presumably, petitioner is no longer incarcerated at the Milwaukee House of Corrections and did not inform the court of his change in address. Dated at Milwaukee, Wisconsin, this 5th day of June, 2015. s/ Lynn Adelman _____________________ LYNN ADELMAN District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?