Earl v. Foster et al

Filing 52

ORDER signed by Judge Rudolph T. Randa on 1/27/2016 DENYING 50 Motion for Reconsideration. (cc: all counsel, via mail to Daryise Earl at Green Bay Correctional Institution) (cb)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
DARYISE L. EARL,
Plaintiff,
-vs-

Case No. 15-CV-282

BRIAN FOSTER, et al.,
Defendants.

DECISION AND ORDER
The plaintiff, a Wisconsin state prisoner, filed a motion asking the
Court to reconsider parts of its December 11, 2015 order on the plaintiff’s
motion to compel. A court may relieve a party from an order under Federal
Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) for several reasons, including mistake,
excusable neglect, newly discovered evidence, fraud, and misconduct by an
opposing party.

“Rule 60(b) relief is an extraordinary remedy and is

granted only in exceptional circumstances.” Id. (quoting Karraker v. RentA-Center, Inc., 411 F.3d 831, 837 (7th Cir. 2005)).
After due consideration, the Court finds that the plaintiff fails to
satisfy the standards of Rule 60(b). While it is clear that the plaintiff is
disappointed, mere disagreement with the Court’s decision is not a
sufficient basis to warrant relief.

THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED THAT the plaintiff’s “Motion to
Reconsider Motion to Compel” (ECF No. 50) is DENIED.
Dated at Milwaukee, Wisconsin, this 27th day of January, 2016.
BY THE COURT:

__________________________
HON. RUDOLPH T. RANDA
U.S. District Judge

-2-