Sanders v. Bowen et al

Filing 38

ORDER signed by Judge Lynn Adelman on 6/24/16 that plaintiffs motion for dismissal of claim and dismissal of all defendants 37 is GRANTED. Further ordering that this action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The Clerk of Court shall enter judgment accordingly. (cc: all counsel, via USPS to plaintiff) (dm)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN FREDRICT SANDERS, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 15-CV-284 NANCY BOWENS and J. BARKER, Defendants. ORDER Defendants Jamie Barker and Nancy Bowens filed their motion for summary judgment on February 11, 2016. On March 23, 2016, and May 4, 2016, I denied plaintiff’s motions to appoint counsel, but each time I gave plaintiff additional time to file his response to the motion for summary judgment. In the May 4, 2016, Order, I directed plaintiff to file his response to defendants’ motion on or before Tuesday, May 31, 2016, and I advised plaintiff that failure to file a time response would result in dismissal of this action pursuant to Civil Local Rule 41(c). Instead of filing a response to defendants’ motion, plaintiff filed a motion for dismissal of his claims and dismissal of all defendants. He asks me to dismiss this case without prejudice so that he may bring his claims again in the future with the assistance of counsel. Defendants did not respond to the motion for voluntary dismissal without prejudice. Therefore, I will grant plaintiff’s motion and dismiss this case without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2). NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion for dismissal of claim and dismissal of all defendants (Docket #37) is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The Clerk of Court shall enter judgment accordingly. Dated at Milwaukee, Wisconsin, this 24th day of June, 2016. s/ Lynn Adelman ______________________________ LYNN ADELMAN District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?