Sedlak et al v. Trebon & Mayhew et al

Filing 68

ORDER signed by Judge Rudolph T. Randa on 6/27/2016 DENYING 60 Plaintiffs' Motion for Reconsideration. (cc: all counsel, via mail to Wayne and Lori Sedlak) (cb)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
WAYNE SEDLAK and LORI C. SEDLAK,
Plaintiffs,
-vs-

Case No. 15-C-567

TREBON & MAYHEW, et al.,
Defendants.
DECISION AND ORDER
The plaintiffs move to reconsider the Court’s ruling that this matter
is barred by the Rooker-Feldman doctrine. Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e). To prevail
on their motion, the plaintiffs must “clearly establish” that the Court
committed a manifest error of law or fact, or that newly discovered
evidence precluded entry of judgment. Blue v. Hartford Life & Acc. Ins. Co.,
698 F.3d 587, 598 (7th Cir. 2012). The plaintiffs did neither. Accordingly,
plaintiffs’ motion [ECF No. 60] is DENIED.
Dated at Milwaukee, Wisconsin, this 27th day of June, 2016.
SO ORDERED:
__________________________
HON. RUDOLPH T. RANDA
U.S. District Judge