Thomas v. Jacobson et al
ORDER DISMISSING CASE signed by Judge J.P. Stadtmueller on 12/27/2016. Action DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to prosecute. (cc: all counsel, via mail to David Thomas at Columbia Correctional Institution)(cb)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
Case No. 15-CV-633-JPS
JANE/JOHN DOES 1, 2, 3, and 5,
On December 2, 2016, the Court granted summary judgment to
Defendants Christopher Schmaling, Dr. Ortiz, and Correctional Healthcare
Companies (“CHC”). (Docket #90). The Court did not dismiss the action as
a whole, however, because four Doe Defendants remained. See id. at 22–25.
Despite Plaintiff’s failure to identify the Doe Defendants within the time
permitted for discovery, the Court granted him one final opportunity to
identify them in an amended complaint.1 Thomas’ amended complaint was
due to be filed on or before December 16, 2016. Id. at 25. To date, no such
pleading has been filed. Accordingly, consistent with the Court’s repeated
warnings, the Court will dismiss Thomas’ claims against the Doe Defendants
without prejudice for failure to prosecute the same. See Civil L. R. 41(c);
Fischer v. Cingular Wireless, LLC, 446 F.3d 663, 665 (7th Cir. 2006).
In a declaration requested by the Court, counsel for CHC avers that he
provided Thomas with Thomas’ complete medical file from the Racine County Jail.
(Docket #92). Counsel also endeavored, unsuccessfully, to provide Thomas with
CHC employee work schedules for the relevant period in order to facilitate
identification of the Does. Id. Counsel’s submission confirms what the Court all
along suspected—that Thomas has had in his possession the documents and
information needed to determine the identities of the Does (or determine that they
could not be identified). Thomas has simply failed to amend his pleadings in
conformity with the discovery materials he has been provided.
IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s claims against Defendants Jane/John
Doe 1, 2, 3, and 5 be and the same are hereby DISMISSED without
prejudice for Plaintiff’s failure to prosecute.
The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment accordingly.
Dated at Milwaukee, Wisconsin, this 27th day of December, 2016.
BY THE COURT:
U.S. District Judge
Page 2 of 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?