Rowe v. Walker et al
Filing
91
ORDER signed by Chief Judge William C Griesbach on 5/25/18.Plaintiff's 90 (Letter) motion to reverse is DENIED. (cc: all counsel and via US Mail to Joshua Rowe)(Griesbach, William)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
JOSHUA W. ROWE,
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No. 15-C-1006
JODY DEROSA et al.,
Defendants.
ORDER
On January 22, 2018, the court granted summary judgment in favor of the defendants and
dismissed the claims alleged against them pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On the same day, judgment
was issued. On March 13, 2018, Plaintiff appealed the court’s decision. On May 9, 2018, the
Seventh Circuit dismissed Plaintiff’s appeal for failure to pay the appellate filing fee. ECF No. 88.
The Seventh Circuit ordered the district court’s clerk to collect the $505 filing fee pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 1915(b); see also Newlin v. Helman, 123 F.3d 429, 434 (7th Cir. 1997).
Now before the court is Plaintiff’s motion to reverse the Seventh Circuit’s order requiring
the fee to be collected. Plaintiff alleges he was unaware that he would be charged the $505 fee if he
did not submit anything to the court. However, a district court has no authority to overturn or
reverse an appellate court order; so, this court cannot entertain Plaintiff’s request. Besides Plaintiff’s
request must be denied on the merits, the Seventh Circuit has already articulated that the obligation
for paying the appellate filing fee “is incurred by filing a notice of appeal; it cannot be avoided by
dismissing the appeal, or by failing to pay when fees are due.” See Newlin, 123 F.3d at 434. Thus,
the moment Plaintiff filed his notice of appeal, he became responsible for the $505 filing fee.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion to reverse (ECF No. 90) is
DENIED.
Dated this
25th
day of May, 2018.
s/ William C. Griesbach
William C. Griesbach, Chief Judge
United States District Court
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?