Jones v. United States of America

Filing 5

ORDER signed by Judge J.P. Stadtmueller on 3/2/2017: ADOPTING 4 Parties' Joint Stipulation as to an Agreed Sentence; GRANTING 1 Petitioner's Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255; and ORDERING an Amended Judgment be issued as to Anthony Lamar Jones in Case No. 08-CR-53-22. (cc: all counsel) (jm)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN ANTHONY LAMAR JONES, Petitioner, Case No. 16-CV-432-JPS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. ORDER On February 28, 2017, the parties filed a joint stipulation recommending that the petitioner’s sentence in Case No. 08-CR-53-22-JPS be amended to that of time-served, followed by a five year term of supervised release. (Docket #4). The Court will accept the parties’ recommendation, grant the petitioner’s motion, and issue an amended judgment accordingly.1 This judgment shall be entered under seal, as was the petitioner’s latest amended judgment from September 1, 2015. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the parties’ joint stipulation as to an agreed sentence (Docket #4) be and the same is hereby ADOPTED; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petitioner’s motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Docket #1) be and the same is hereby GRANTED; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court issue an amended judgment under seal as to Anthony Lamar Jones in Case No. 08-CR53-22-JPS in accordance with the parties’ joint stipulation as to an agreed sentence (Docket #4); and 1 The petitioner has waived his right to appear in person for re-sentencing. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment in Case No. 16-CV-432-JPS in accordance with this order. Dated at Milwaukee, Wisconsin, this 2nd day of March, 2017. BY THE COURT: J.P. Stadtmueller U.S. District Judge Page 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?