Baumann Farms, LLP et al v. Yin Wall City Inc et al
Filing
75
DECISION AND ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge William E Duffin on 1/24/2019. The Court hereby grants final approval of the Settlement, and this entire action, including all claims, counterclaims and third-party claims, is dismissed with prejudice. Th e Court grants Plaintiffs' Motions (ECF No. 67 ) for attorneys' fees in the reasonable sum of $64,000.00; expenses in the reasonable amount of $5,556.30; and Class Representative participation awards to the three named Plaintiffs in the reasonable amount of $1,500.00 each, all to be paid from the Settlement Fund. The Court grants Plaintiffs' Motion to File Exhibit A to the Declaration of Michael T. Hopkins Regarding Registered Ginseng Growers and Class Members Under Seal (ECF No. 71 ). (cc: all counsel) (mlm)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
BAUMANN FARMS, LLP
a Wisconsin limited liability partnership;
GLENN HEIER; and AARON KAISER,
Plaintiffs,
v.
Case No. 16-CV-605
YIN WALL CITY, INC., an Illinois
corporation; SUT I. FONG; CHEONG SAT O;
YIN WALL CITY, DALLAS, INC.,
a Texas Corporation,
Defendants.
YIN WALL CITY, INC. (Illinois),
YIN WALL CITY, INC. (Texas), and
YIN WALL CITY DALLAS, INC.,
Counterclaim and
Third-Party Plaintiffs,
v.
BAUMANN FARMS, LLP; GLENN HEIER;
and AARON KAISER,
Counterclaim Defendants
and
GINSENG BOARD OF WISCONSIN, INC.;
THOMAS HACK, JOE HEIL and KURT BAUMANN,
Third-Party Defendants.
__________________________________________________________________
DECISION AND ORDER
Having come before the Court on January 23, 2019, for a Final Fairness Hearing
related to the parties’ stipulated Class Action Settlement, on their joint motion for final
approval of the Class Action Settlement, and on Plaintiffs’ Motion for Approval of Class
Counsel’s Fees and Expenses and Plaintiffs’ Participation Awards, the Court, having
considered the full record, including the arguments and submissions of counsel, hereby
finds:
A. The Court previously preliminarily approved the parties’ stipulated Class
Action Settlement, and certified the Settlement Class as
[A]ll individuals and entities engaged in the business of cultivating ginseng
in the State of Wisconsin who have registered as ginseng growers with
Wisconsin’s DATCP as mandated by Wis. Stats. § 94.50(2), during the
calendar years 2010 through 2015, excluding Certified Class members who
have previously asked to be excluded from the Class, defendants, and all
officers, directors, employees, and agents of defendants.
(ECF No. 66 at 2-4.)
B. Pursuant to the Court’s Decision and Order of September 14, 2018, preliminarily
approving the parties’ Class Action Settlement (ECF No. 66), Class Counsel caused copies
of the Notice of Settlement and Final Fairness Hearing (ECF No. 62-2; see ECF No. 70, ¶ 2) to
be mailed to the 244 members of the Settlement Class via the U.S. Postal Service, First
Class postage, prepaid, on October 15, 2018.
C. As of October 15, 2018, Class Counsel also posted downloadable pdf copies of
all relevant and required documents concerning this litigation, as well as the Court’s
preliminary approval of the parties’ stipulated Class Action Settlement and notice of the
Final Fairness Hearing to the URL “www.ip-lit.us/ginseng-ywc,” as required by the
Court’s Decision and Order of September 14, 2018. (See ECF No. 70-2.)
2
D. The class notice required by Rule 23(e), Fed. R. Civ. P., has been provided in
accordance with the Court’s Decision and Order preliminarily approving the Class
Action settlement, which notice, by mail and website posting having been given in an
adequate and sufficient manner, constitutes the best notice practicable under the
circumstances and satisfies the requirements of Rule 23(e) and due process. (See generally
ECF No. 70.)
E. Since this Court’s preliminary approval of the Settlement Agreement, neither
the Court nor Class Counsel have received a settlement opt-out notice; an objection to
Class Counsel’s proposed fees or expenses; or an objection to Plaintiffs’ proposed
participation awards from any of the 244 certified Settlement Class members.
F. The settlement as set forth in the Settlement Agreement was negotiated at armslength, is fair, reasonable and adequate to members of the Class in light of the complexity,
expense, and duration of litigation and the risks involved in establishing liability and
damages, and in maintaining the class action through trial and appeal.
G. The relief provided under the settlement constitutes fair value given in
exchange for the releases of claims against the Released Parties.
H. The parties and each member of the Class have irrevocably submitted to the
exclusive jurisdiction of this Court for any suit, action, proceeding or dispute arising out
of the Settlement Agreement.
3
I. It is in the best interests of the parties and the members of the Class and
consistent with principles of judicial economy that any dispute between any member of
the Class (including any dispute as to whether any person is a member of the Class) and
any Released Party which in any way relates to the applicability or scope of the Settlement
Agreement or this Final Judgment and Order of Dismissal should be presented
exclusively to this Court for resolution by this Court.
BASED UPON THE FOREGOING, it is hereby ORDERED as follows:
1. The Court hereby grants final approval of the Settlement, and this entire action,
including all claims, counterclaims and third-party claims, is dismissed with prejudice.
2. All parties shall be bound by all of the terms, conditions and obligations of the
Settlement Agreement, and all determinations and judgments in the action concerning
the Settlement.
3. The Court grants final approval to the method of allocation and distribution of
the Settlement Fund as set forth in the Settlement Agreement. Class Counsel, as the
Settlement Administrator, shall distribute the funds according to the terms of the
Settlement Agreement.
4. The Court grants Plaintiffs' Motions (ECF No. 67) for attorneys' fees in the
reasonable sum of $64,000.00; expenses in the reasonable amount of $5,556.30; and Class
Representative participation awards to the three named Plaintiffs in the reasonable
amount of $1,500.00 each, all to be paid from the Settlement Fund.
4
5. The Court grants Plaintiffs’ Motion to File Exhibit A to the Declaration of
Michael T. Hopkins Regarding Registered Ginseng Growers and Class Members Under
Seal (ECF No. 71).
6. The Court hereby enters Final Judgment in this case and dismisses this case with
prejudice in accordance with the terms of the Settlement Agreement. There being no
reason to delay entry of this Final Judgment, the Clerk of the Court is ordered to forthwith
enter this Final Judgment pursuant to Rule 54(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
SO ORDERED.
Dated at Milwaukee, Wisconsin this 24th day of January, 2019.
_________________________
WILLIAM E. DUFFIN
U.S. Magistrate Judge
5
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?