Spencer v. City of Milwaukee Police Department et al

Filing 99

ORDER signed by Judge Pamela Pepper on 12/6/2018 APPROVING 97 Stipulation regarding review of deposition transcripts. (cc: all counsel)(cb)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

JERPAUL D. SPENCER,
Plaintiff,
v.

Case No. 16-cv-662-pp

ED FLYNN, MICHAEL VAGNINI,
JACOB KNIGHT, JEFFREY CLINE,
PAUL MARTINEZ, GREGORY KUSPA,
JESS BUSSHARDT, MICHAEL VALUCH,
and KEITH GARLAND,
Defendants.
ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION (DKT. NO. 97)

On November 27, 2018, the parties filed a stipulation granting plaintiff’s
counsel permission to review deposition transcripts in the possession of
Attorney Ronald Bornstein, which are subject to a protective order in Willie
Newman v. City of Milwaukee, et al., Case No. 15-cv-1363-jps (E.D. Wis.). Dkt.
No. 97. Plaintiff’s counsel would like to review the transcripts without violating
the order.
The court APPROVES counsels’ stipulation. Attorney Nathaniel Cade,
Jr., as counsel for the plaintiff, may review deposition transcripts in Attorney
Ronald Bornstein’s possession taken in Willie Newman v. City of Milwaukee,
15-cv-1363-jps (E.D. Wis.), without violating the protective order in that case. If
Attorney Cade wants to share those transcripts with the plaintiff, Jerpaul
Spencer, Attorney Cade must redact any confidential or personal information
1

consistent with the protective order entered in Newman, 15-cv-1363, dkt. no.
14. Attorney Cade must provide Attorney Naomi Gehling with a copy of any
such redacted transcript at least ten business days in advance of disclosure so
that Attorney Gehling can review to the transcript(s) and confirm that no
confidential or personal information may be viewed by the plaintiff in violation
of the Newman protective order.
Dated in Milwaukee, Wisconsin this 6th day of December, 2018.
BY THE COURT:
_____________________________________
HON. PAMELA PEPPER
United States District Judge

2