Dotson v. Zielieke et al

Filing 27

ORDER DISMISSING CASE signed by Judge Pamela Pepper on 7/11/2017 GRANTING 26 Plaintiff's letter motion to voluntarily dismiss case and ORDERING case DIMSISSED without prejudice so plaintiff can exhaust administrative remedies. (cc: all counsel, via mail to Lanita Dotson at Taycheedah Correctional Institution)(cb)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN ______________________________________________________________________________ LANITA DOTSON, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 16-cv-1008-pp RANDY ZIELIEKE, et al., Defendants. ______________________________________________________________________________ ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO DISMISS CASE (DKT. NO. 26) ______________________________________________________________________________ On June 24, 2017, the court issued an order, requiring the plaintiff to show cause why the court should not dismiss her case for failure to respond to the defendants’ motion for summary judgment based on exhaustion of administrative remedies. Dkt. No. 25. On July 5, 2017, the court received the plaintiff’s response—she explained that she did not know that she had to respond to the motion, given that she had filed her motion for summary judgment first. Dkt. No. 26. She also requested to voluntarily dismiss her case so that she can exhaust administrative remedies and refile later. Id. The court will grant that request, and will dismiss the case without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P 41(a)(2). The court GRANTS the plaintiff’s letter motion to voluntarily dismiss her 1 case. Dkt. No. 26. The court ORDERS that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice. Dated in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, this 11th day of July, 2017. BY THE COURT: ________________________________________ HON. PAMELA PEPPER United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?