Jones v. Schnabl et al

Filing 10

ORDER DISMISSING CASE signed by Judge Pamela Pepper on 9/18/2017. Case DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to prosecute under FRCP 41(b) and Civil L.R. 41(c)(E.D. Wis.). (cc: all counsel, via mail to Derrick Jones at Stanley Correctional Institution)(cb)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN ______________________________________________________________________________ DERRICK P. JONES, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 16-cv-1355-pp MEG SCHNABL, and CONNIE ACHERSON, Defendants. ______________________________________________________________________________ ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE ______________________________________________________________________________ In an order entered August 2, 2017, the court resolved the plaintiff’s pending motions, screened the plaintiff’s complaint, and gave the plaintiff the opportunity to file an amended complaint on or before September 8, 2017. Dkt. No. 9. The court warned the plaintiff that if the court did not receive the plaintiff’s amended complaint by that deadline, the court would dismiss the case based on the plaintiff’s failure to diligently pursue it. Id. at 6. To date, the court has not received an amended complaint. Nor has the plaintiff communicated with the court in any way since the August 2, 2017, order. From this, the court concludes that the plaintiff no longer wishes to prosecute this case. The court ORDERS that this case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE 1 for failure to prosecute under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) and Civil Local rule 41(c) (E.D. Wis.). The clerk will enter judgment accordingly. Dated in Milwaukee, Wisconsin this 18th day of September, 2017. BY THE COURT: ________________________________________ HON. PAMELA PEPPER United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?