Py v. Beth et al

Filing 17

ORDER signed by Judge J.P. Stadtmueller on 2/22/2017 GRANTING 16 Defendants' Request to Withdraw Motion to Quash Service and Dismiss the Complaint (Docket #8). (cc: all counsel)(jm)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN BRENDA L. PY, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 16-CV-1643-JPS DAVID BETH, LT. EDWARD VAN TINE, LUCIA KONKEN, JESSICA GERRETSEN, JAMES BEZOTTE, BRANDON SMITH, TIM HANEY, BILLY CAMERON, STUART SCHWERDFEGER, STEVEN REA, ROB PALLAMOLLA, DAWN SMITH, BARB OBERHART, JUDY MILLER, DENA WENDLING, KENOSHA COUNTY, and UNKNOWN sued as Unknown Jailers and/or Nurses, ORDER Defendants. On December 12, 2016, Defendants removed this action from Kenosha Count Circuit Court. (Docket #1). On January 9, 2017, several defendants then identified as “3 Unknown and Unnamed Nurses for the Kenosha County Jail” moved to quash service of process on them and requested that the complaint be dismissed as to them for Plaintiff’s failure to effect proper service. (Docket #8). On February 16, 2017, prior to a ruling on the motion, Plaintiff filed an amended complaint. (Docket #15). The amended complaint names the specific nurses who were previously unidentified. Id. ¶ 6. On February 22, 2017, those nurse defendants filed a notice indicating that they plan to waive service of the amended complaint and that they believe their motion to quash is moot in light of the amended complaint. (Docket #16). They request to withdraw the motion, and the Court will grant that request. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Defendants’ request to withdraw their motion to quash service and dismiss the complaint (Docket #16) be and the same is hereby GRANTED; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants’ motion to quash service and dismiss the complaint (Docket #8) shall be noted on the docket as having been withdrawn. Dated at Milwaukee, Wisconsin, this 22nd day of February, 2017. BY THE COURT: J.P. Stadtmueller U.S. District Judge Page 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?