Wells v. Miller et al
ORDER DISMISSING CASE signed by Judge Pamela Pepper on 11/20/2017. Case DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to diligently pursue it under Civil L.R. 41(c). (cc: all counsel, via mail to Dizzy Wells at Kettle Moraine Correctional Institution)(cb)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
DIZZY D. WELLS, JR.,
Case No. 16-cv-1680-pp
WEND MILLER, et al.,
DECISION AND ORDER DISMISSING CASE
On August 29, 2017, the court gave the plaintiff the opportunity to file
an amended complaint by September 29, 2017. Dkt. No. 8. At the plaintiff’s
request (dkt. no. 9), the court extended the deadline to November 1, 2017. Dkt.
No. 10. The court advised the plaintiff that if he chose not to file an amended
complaint by the deadline, the court would dismiss his case without prejudice
based on his failure to diligently pursue it. See Civil L.R. 41(c). According to the
court’s records, the plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint (or anything
else) since the court extended that deadline, and the deadline now has passed.
The court DISMISSES this case without prejudice. The plaintiff may
refile his complaint, subject to any relevant statute of limitations. If he does,
the court will require him to pay another filing fee.
Dated in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, this 20th day of November, 2017.
BY THE COURT:
HON. PAMELA PEPPER
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?