Mader v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 27

ORDER signed by Chief Judge Pamela Pepper on 2/27/2020 GRANTING 26 stipulated motion for attorney fees under the EAJA. Defendant to pay plaintiff $6,600 award of attorney fees in full satisfaction and settlement of any and all claims plaintiff may have in this case under EAJA. (cc: all counsel) (cb)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN THOMAS GERARD MADER, Plaintiff, Case No. 16-cv-1705-pp v. COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant. ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION FOR AWARD UNDER THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT (DKT. NO. 26) On February 26, 2020, the parties filed a Stipulated Motion to an Award of Attorney Fees Pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412, asking the court to enter an order awarding attorneys’ fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act. Dkt. No. 26. The court APPROVES the stipulation and GRANTS the parties’ motion for award under the EAJA. Dkt. No. 26. The court ORDERS that the defendant shall pay to the plaintiff an award of attorneys’ fees in the amount of $6,600, in full satisfaction and settlement of any and all claims the plaintiff may have in this case under the EAJA. The court awards these fees to the plaintiff, not the plaintiff’s attorney, and under Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586 (2010), the United States may offset the award to satisfy pre-existing debts that the litigant owes the United States. 1 If counsel for the parties verify that the plaintiff owes no pre-existing debt subject to offset, the defendant shall direct that the award be made payable to the plaintiff’s attorney, pursuant to the EAJA assignment duly signed by the plaintiff and counsel. Dated in Milwaukee, Wisconsin this 27th day of February, 2020. BY THE COURT: _____________________________________ HON. PAMELA PEPPER Chief United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?