In Re: Petition filed by Jason Goodwill
Filing
2
ORDER DISMISSING CASE signed by Judge Charles N Clevert, Jr on 1/31/17. Copy of order sent via US Mail to Jason Goodwill. ((kwb), C. N. Clevert, Jr.)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
IN RE:
PETITION FILED BY JASON GOODWILL
Case No. 16-mc-38
ORDER DISMISSING CASE
On August 18, 2016, Jason Goodwill filed a miscellaneous case in the Eastern
District of Wisconsin. The 84-page document consists of an order of default judgment from
the Sheboygan County Circuit Court, as well as numerous other documents that appear
to have been filed in Sheboygan, Michigan, and prior cases in this district. After reading
the entirety of his rambling submissions, Goodwill appears to take issue with the actions
or inactions of a "kangaroo court" regarding a petition for writ of coram nobis that he filed
in the state court. There are numerous other references to "fictitious plaintiffs and judges,"
"dirty cops," and "void judgments." However, there are no allegations that give rise to a
cognizable claim in the federal court, or that would provide a basis for the court's exercise
of jurisdiction. This court notes that Goodwill's prior petition for writ of habeas corpus
challenging the same judgment of conviction was dismissed by Judge Patricia Gorence on
April 5, 2013. Goodwill v. Clements, Case No. 12-C-1096 (E.D. Wis. 2013). Other cases
have been dismissed as well, including a RICO case referenced by Goodwill in his
documents. Goodwill v. City of Sheboygan, et al, Case No. 12-C-1093 (E.D. Wis. 2013).
Because the court cannot discern any federal claim that would be properly heard as a
miscellaneous case and Goodwill cannot use this filing to circumvent the rulings in his prior
cases,
IT IS ORDERED that the case is dismissed.
Dated at Milwaukee, Wisconsin, this 31st day of January, 2017.
BY THE COURT
s/ C. N. Clevert, Jr.
C. N. Clevert, Jr.
U.S. District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?