Fanning et al v. Great Lakes Excavating, Inc.
Filing
25
ORDER signed by Judge J.P. Stadtmueller on 6/18/2018 GRANTING 21 Plaintiffs' Motion for Entry of Turn-Over Order. Garnishee-Defendant Associated Bank shall pay to Plaintiffs the sum of $1,013.90. See Order. (cc: all counsel) (jm)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
MICHAEL R. FANNING and CENTRAL
PENSION FUND OF THE
INTERNATIONAL UNION OF
OPERATING ENGINEERS AND
PARTICIPATING EMPLOYERS,
Plaintiffs,
Case No. 16-MC-43-JPS
v.
GREAT LAKES EXCAVATING, INC.,
ORDER
Defendant,
and
ASSOCIATED BANK,
Garnishee-Defendant.
On July 12, 2016, judgment was entered in favor of Plaintiffs and
against Defendant in the amount of $79,246.78, together with costs and
post-judgment interest, in the United States District Court for the District of
Columbia, Case No. 16-CV-497-APM. (Docket #1). On June 23, 2017,
Plaintiffs served a Garnishment Summons and Complaint on Associated
Bank. (Docket #3). On July 17, 2017, Associated Bank answered, indicating
that it was in possession of $1,013.90 of Defendant’s assets. (Docket #17).
This matter now comes before the Court on Plaintiffs’ motion for
entry of a turn-over order against Associated Bank in the amount of
$1,013.90. (Docket #21). Plaintiffs indicate that there remains $36,653.63,
plus post-judgment interest, due and owing on the judgment entered on
July 12, 2016. Id. at 2. The Court is satisfied that Plaintiffs are entitled to a
turn-over order against Associated Bank in the amount of $1,013.90. See
Fed. R. Civ. P. 69(a); Wis. Stat. §§ 812.01 et seq.
Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ motion for entry of a turn-over
order against Garnishee-Defendant Associated Bank (Docket #21) be and
the same is hereby GRANTED; and
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Garnishee-Defendant Associated
Bank shall pay to Plaintiffs the sum of $1,013.90.
Dated at Milwaukee, Wisconsin, this 18th day of June, 2018.
BY THE COURT:
J.P. Stadtmueller
U.S. District Judge
Page 2 of 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?