Jackson v. Murphy et al

Filing 226

ORDER signed by Chief Judge Pamela Pepper on 7/24/2020. 207 Plaintiff's motion to proceed without prepaying appellate filing fee GRANTED; within 30 days plaintiff to pay $30.74 initial partial filing fee in appeal; once initial payment is made, agency having custody of plaintiff to collect $474.26 balance of appellate filing fee from plaintiff's prison trust account under 28 USC §1915(b)(2). 210 213 Plaintiff's second and third motions to proceed without prepaying appellate filing fee DENIED as moot. (cc: all counsel, via mail to Keith Jackson and Warden at Oshkosh Correctional Institution)(cb)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN ______________________________________________________________________________ KEITH JACKSON, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 17-cv-194-pp Appeal No. 20-2062 DR. PATRICK MURPHY, et al., Defendants. ______________________________________________________________________________ ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED WITHOUT PREPAYING APPELLATE FILING FEE (DKT. NO. 207) AND DENYING AS MOOT PLAINTIFF’S SECOND AND THIRD MOTIONS FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED WITHOUT PREPAYING APPELLATE FILING FEE (DKT. NOS. 210, 213) ______________________________________________________________________________ On June 1, 2020, the court issued an order dismissing this case. Dkt. No. 194. The plaintiff filed a “motion for reconsideration” and the court denied that motion on July 24, 2020. Dkt. No. 225. The plaintiff filed a notice of appeal on June 19, 2020.1 Dkt. No. 200. He has filed three motions for leave to proceed with his appeal without prepaying the appellate filing fee. Dkt. Nos. 207, 210, 213. On June 29, 2020, the plaintiff filed another motion to appeal without prepaying the filing fee, which the Clerk’s Office treated as a second notice of appeal, and appeal number 20-2138 was opened. Dkt. No. 212. On June 30, 2020, the Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit administratively closed 202138 because two separate appeals were not necessary. Jackson v. Murphy, No. 20-2138 (7th Cir. June 30, 2020). 1 1 Case 2:17-cv-00194-PP Filed 07/24/20 Page 1 of 5 Document 226 Under the Prison Litigation Reform Act, a prisoner must pay the applicable filing fees in full for a civil case. 28 U.S.C. §1915(b). If a prisoner does not have the money to pay the $505.00 appellate filing fee in advance, he can ask the court for permission to proceed without prepaying the fee. For the court to consider such a request, the prisoner must complete a petition and affidavit and return it to the court, along with a certified copy of the prisoner’s trust account statement showing transactions for the prior six months. 28 U.S.C. §1915(a)(2). The court must assess an initial partial filing fee of twenty percent of the average monthly deposits to the plaintiff’s prison account or average monthly balance in the plaintiff's prison account for the six-month period immediately preceding the filing of the notice of appeal, whichever is greater. 28 U.S.C. §1915(b)(1). After the prisoner pays the initial fee, he must make monthly payments of twenty percent of the preceding month’s income until he pays the filing fee in full. 28 U.S.C. §1915(b)(2). The agency that has custody of the prisoner will collect the money and send payments to the court. There are three grounds for denying a prisoner appellant’s request to proceed without prepaying the filing fee: the prisoner has not shown that he is indigent, the prisoner filed the appeal in bad faith or the prisoner has three strikes. See 28 U.S.C. §§1915(a)(2)-(3), (g). The court finds that the plaintiff has established that he is indigent and that he has not accrued three strikes. That leaves only the question of whether the plaintiff filed this appeal in good faith. 2 Case 2:17-cv-00194-PP Filed 07/24/20 Page 2 of 5 Document 226 If a court allowed a party to proceed without prepaying the filing fee in the district court, that party may proceed without prepaying the filing fee on appeal without further authorization, unless the district court certifies that the appeal is not taken in good faith or determines that the party is otherwise not entitled to proceed without prepaying the fee. Fed. R. App. P. 24(a). See also Celske v. Edwards, 164 F.3d 396, 398 (7th Cir. 1999) (“. . . a plaintiff who . . . was allowed to proceed in forma pauperis in the district court retains his IFP status in the court of appeals unless there is a certification of bad faith.”). A district court should not apply an inappropriately high standard when making a good faith determination. Pate v. Stevens, 163 F.3d 437, 439 (7th Cir. 1998). An appeal taken in “good faith” is one that seeks review of any issue that is not frivolous, meaning that it involves “legal points arguable on their merits.” Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983) (quoting Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)); see also Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 445 (1962). On the other hand, an appeal taken in bad faith is one that is based on a frivolous claim, that is, a claim that no reasonable person could suppose has any merit. Lee v. Clinton, 209 F.3d 1025, 1026 (7th Cir. 2000). The court does not find any indication that the plaintiff did not take this appeal in good faith. The court will grant the motion to proceed on appeal without prepaying the filing fee. The plaintiff has filed a certified copy of his prison trust account statement for the six-month period immediately preceding the filing of his 3 Case 2:17-cv-00194-PP Filed 07/24/20 Page 3 of 5 Document 226 notice of appeal. A review of this information reveals that the plaintiff must pay an initial partial filing fee of $30.74, as well as additional payments under 28 U.S.C. §1915(b)(2). Newlin v. Helman, 123 F.3d 429, 434 (7th Cir. 1997), rev’d on other grounds by, Walker v. O’Brien, 216 F.3d 626 (7th Cir. 2000) and Lee v. Clinton, 209 F.3d 1025 (7th Cir. 2000). The court GRANTS the plaintiff’s motion for leave to appeal without prepaying the filing fee. Dkt. No. 207. The court DENIES AS MOOT the plaintiff’s second and third motions for leave to appeal without prepaying the filing fee. Dkt. Nos. 210, 213. The court ORDERS that within thirty days of the date of this order, the plaintiff shall forward to the Clerk of Court the sum of $30.74 as the initial partial filing fee for this appeal. If the clerk does not receive that amount by the end of the thirtieth day, the court of appeals may dismiss the appeal. The plaintiff shall identify the payment by the case name and appellate case number (Case No. 20-2062). The court will send a copy of this order to the officer in charge of the agency where the plaintiff is confined. The court ORDERS that after the plaintiff has paid the initial filing fee, the agency that has custody of the plaintiff must collect from his institution trust account the $474.26 balance of the filing fee by collecting monthly payments from the plaintiff's prison trust account in an amount equal to 20% of the preceding month’s income credited to the prisoner’s trust account and forwarding payments to the Clerk of Court each time the amount in the 4 Case 2:17-cv-00194-PP Filed 07/24/20 Page 4 of 5 Document 226 account exceeds $10 in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2). The agency must clearly identify the payments by the case name and number. If the plaintiff transfers to another institution—county, state or federal—the transferring institution must forward a copy of this order, along with the plaintiff’s remaining balance, to the receiving institution. The court will provide a copy of this order to PLRA Attorney, United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, through the court’s electronic case filing system. Dated in Milwaukee, Wisconsin this 24th day of July, 2020. BY THE COURT: ________________________________________ HON. PAMELA PEPPER Chief United States District Judge 5 Case 2:17-cv-00194-PP Filed 07/24/20 Page 5 of 5 Document 226

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?