Flynn v. Williams
Filing
8
ORDER signed by Judge J.P. Stadtmueller on 5/10/2017: ADOPTING 7 Plaintiff's Notice of Dismissal and DISMISSING action without prejudice. (cc: all counsel, via mail to Darryl Allen Flynn at Waupun Correctional Institution)(jm)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
DARRYL ALLEN FLYNN,
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No. 17-CV-553-JPS
NATASHA WILLIAMS,
Defendant.
ORDER
On April 18, 2017, Plaintiff, a prisoner, filed this action pro se.
(Docket #1). On April 20, 2017, the Court ordered Plaintiff to either pay an
initial partial filing fee as calculated under the Prison Litigation Reform
Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1915, or, if he wished to avoid paying the filing fee in this
case, to file a notice of voluntary dismissal. (Docket #5). Plaintiff has done
the latter by filing a notice of dismissal on May 8, 2017. (Docket #7). The
Court will adopt that notice and dismiss this case. See Fed. R. Civ. P.
41(a)(1)(A)(i).1
Accordingly,
In his notice, Plaintiff requests a refund of his initial partial filing fee.
(Docket #7). However, he has not paid any fee in this case yet, so nothing can be
refunded to him. It may be that Plaintiff is referring to his other civil case, Case
No. 17-CV-312 (E.D. Wis.), in which he paid an initial partial filing fee of $15.62.
In that case, Plaintiff was given the same choice as in this one: voluntarily
dismiss and avoid paying any fee, or proceed to screening. Because Plaintiff did
not choose to voluntarily dismiss that action, he has lost his opportunity to
recoup any part of the filing fee in that case. See Thomas v. Zatecky, 712 F.3d 1004,
1005 (7th Cir. 2013) (“A litigant who proceeds in forma pauperis still owes the
fees.”); Abdul-Wood v. Nathan, 91 F.3d 1023, 1025 (7th Cir. 1996) (“All § 1915 has
ever done is excuse pre-payment of the docket fees; a litigant remains liable for
them, and for other costs, although poverty may make collection impossible.”).
1
IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s notice of dismissal (Docket #7) be
and the same is hereby ADOPTED; this action be and the same is hereby
DISMISSED without prejudice.
Dated at Milwaukee, Wisconsin, this 10th of May, 2017.
BY THE COURT:
J.P. Stadtmueller
U.S. District Judge
Page 2 of 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?