Wortman v. Racine Circuit Court et al

Filing 6

ORDER signed by Judge J.P. Stadtmueller on 6/19/2017 DENYING 5 Plaintiff's Motions to Proceed Without Filing a Trust Account Statement and for an Order Removing Plaintiff From the Racine County Jail. Plaintiff to file a copy of his statement, as required by the PLRA, by 6/29/2017 or this action will be dismissed without prejudice and without further notice. (cc: all counsel, via mail to Daniel Wortman at Racine County Jail) (jm)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN DANIEL WORTMAN, Plaintiff, v. RACINE CIRCUIT COURT, PUBLIC DEFENDER’S OFFICE, RACINE COUNTY JAIL, JUDGE EMILY MULLER, EILEEN HENRY, and LT. FRIEND, Case No. 17-CV-775-JPS-JPS ORDER Defendants. On June 16, 2017, Plaintiff submitted a letter to the Clerk of the Court requesting that 1) he be allowed to proceed without submitting a certified copy of his prisoner trust account statement, and 2) the U.S. Marshal’s Service take him out of the Racine County Jail. (Docket #5). Both requests will be denied. Plaintiff has already been afforded more than two weeks to submit his trust account statement. See (Docket #3). If the Court has not received a copy of the statement as required by the Prison Litigation Reform Act by June 29, 2017, this action will be dismissed without prejudice and without further notice. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2). Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motions to proceed without filing a trust account statement and for an order removing him from the Racine County Jail (Docket #5) be and the same are hereby DENIED; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall submit a certified copy of his prisoner trust account statement for the preceding six months no later than June 29, 2017. Dated at Milwaukee, Wisconsin, this 19th day of June, 2017. BY THE COURT: ____________________________________ J. P. Stadtmueller U.S. District Judge Page 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?