Daul v. Doe

Filing 111

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge William E Duffin on 7/9/2019. IT IS THEREFORE RECOMMENDED that the defendants' motion forsummary judgment (ECF No. 94 ) be GRANTED based on Daul's failure to opposethe motion and based on his failure to diligently pursue his case. IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED that this case be DISMISSED and that judgment be entered accordingly. Case no longer referred to Magistrate Judge William E Duffin. (cc: all counsel, plaintiff)(mlm)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN JESSE AARON DAUL, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 17-CV-952 CHRIS DELFOSSE, et al., Defendants. REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Plaintiff Jesse Aaron Daul is proceeding against the defendants on claims arising under the Eighth Amendment. On May 28, 2019, the defendants moved for summary judgment. The defendants included with their motion a copy of Civil L.R. 56, which requires a party opposing a motion for summary judgment to file his response materials within thirty days of service of the motion. (ECF No. 94 at 10.) They also included a copy of Civil L.R. 7, which informs parties that the sanction for failing to file a memorandum in opposition to a motion is sufficient cause for the court to grant the motion. (Id. at 6.) Under the rules, Daul’s response materials were due on June 27, 2019. Daul did not respond to the defendants’ motion for summary judgment, nor did he ask the court for an extension of the deadline to respond. IT IS THEREFORE RECOMMENDED that the defendants’ motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 94) be GRANTED based on Daul’s failure to oppose the motion and based on his failure to diligently pursue his case. IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED that this case be DISMISSED and that judgment be entered accordingly. Daul’s attention is directed to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and (C) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2), which allow Daul to file written objections to the court’s recommendation within fourteen days of service of the recommendation. Daul’s failure to timely file objections with the district court shall result in a waiver of his right to appeal. Dated in Milwaukee, Wisconsin this 9th day of July, 2019.                                   WILLIAM E. DUFFIN U.S. Magistrate Judge 2     

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?