Yanko v. State of Wisconsin
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge William E Duffin on 8/7/17 as to Douglas M Yanko. IT IS RECOMMENDED that Petitioner's Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. 1 ) be dismissed without prejudice. Case reassigned to Chief Judge William C Griesbach. Judge Magistrate Judge William E Duffin no longer assigned to the case. (cc: all counsel, Mr. Yanko via US Mail)(mlm)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
DOUGLAS M. YANKO,
Case No. 17-CV-1011
STATE OF WISCONSIN,
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
Petitioner Douglas Yanko, who is incarcerated pursuant to the judgment of a
Wisconsin Circuit Court, filed petition for a writ of habeas corpus. (ECF No. 1.) Yanko’s
petition was assigned to this court and he consented to the full jurisdiction of a
magistrate judge. (ECF No. 3) Therefore, the court must now screen the petition in
accordance with Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, which states:
If it plainly appears from the petition and any attached exhibits that the
petitioner is not entitled to relief in the district court, the judge must
dismiss the petition and direct the clerk to notify the petitioner. If the
petition is not dismissed, the judge must order the respondent to file an
answer, motion, or other response within a fixed time, or to take other
action the judge may order.
According to his petition, Yanko was convicted on April 30, 2013, in Ozaukee
County of Repeated Sexual Assault of Same Child. He alleges ineffective assistance of
trial counsel, error in the trial court’s exercise of sentencing discretion, prosecutorial
misconduct, denial of due process rights, and denial of a fair and impartial jury. (ECF
No. 1.) According to the records of the Wisconsin Court of Appeals and the Wisconsin
Supreme Court, accessible at https://wscca.wicourts.gov, it appears that Yanko’s appeal
to the Wisconsin Supreme Court is still pending. See Wis. Appeal No. 2015AP002296.
The petition for review was filed on June 16, 2017, and received by the Wisconsin
Supreme Court, but no decision has been rendered.
Before turning to a federal court for relief by way of petition for a writ of habeas
corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254, a person convicted in state court must first exhaust the
remedies available to him in state court. 28 U.S.C. § 2254(b)(1)(A), (C). Exhaustion of
state remedies is a threshold requirement before a federal habeas court considers the
merits of the petitioner’s claims. Day v. McDonough, 547 U.S. 198, 205 (2006).
Due to the pending appeal before the Wisconsin Supreme Court, Yanko has not
shown that he has exhausted in state court his remedies for the claims he now raises in
his habeas petition. Upon completion of the appeal Yanko may raise the exhausted
claims in a new habeas petition. The recommended dismissal of Yanko’s petition is not
a conclusion that his claims lack merit but only that his petition is premature.
Finally, the State of Wisconsin is not the appropriate respondent for this action.
The “state” has sovereign immunity from suit in federal court. Under Rule 2(a) of the
Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, the “state officer” having custody of the petitioner
is the proper respondent. Bridges v. Chambers, 425 F.3d 1048, 1050 (7th Cir. 2005). Yanko
states he is detained at the Wisconsin Resource Center. The official in charge of that
facility is Byran Bartow. For future filings, Byran Bartow would be the proper
IT IS RECOMMENDED that Petitioner’s Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus
(ECF No. 1) be dismissed without prejudice.
Your attention is directed to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and (C) and Fed. R. Civ. P.
72(b)(2) whereby written objections to any recommendation herein or part thereof may
be filed within fourteen days of service of this recommendation. Objections are to be
filed in accordance with the Eastern District of Wisconsin’s electronic case filing
procedures. Failure to file a timely objection with the district court shall result in a
waiver of your right to appeal.
Dated at Milwaukee, Wisconsin this 7th day of August, 2017.
WILLIAM E. DUFFIN
U.S. Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?