Walker v. Hoch et al

Filing 5

ORDER signed by Judge J.P. Stadtmueller on 8/28/2017 DISMISSING CASE without prejudice for plaintiff's failure to prosecute. (cc: all counsel, via mail to Alexandria Marie Walker at Taycheedah Correctional Institution)(jm)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN ALEXANDRIA MARIE WALKER, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 17-CV-1024-JPS OFFICER HOCH and OFFICER PATTEN, ORDER Defendants. Plaintiff, who is incarcerated at Taycheedah Correctional Institution, filed a pro se complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that her civil rights were violated. (Docket #1). She has also filed a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. (Docket #2). However, she did not include with her motion a copy of her prison trust account statement for the six-month period preceding the filing of the complaint, as required by Section 1915(a)(2). As a result, on July 25, 2017, the Clerk of the Court sent Plaintiff a letter requesting that she submit her trust account statement within twenty-one days. (Docket #3). That deadline passed but Plaintiff did not file her trust account statement. The Court afforded her seven more days to comply with this directive, warning her that failure to do so would result in dismissal of her case. (Docket #4); Fischer v. Cingular Wireless, LLC, 446 F.3d 663, 665 (7th Cir. 2006). Still she has not submitted the trust account statement or otherwise communicated with the Court in any fashion. Because she has not complied with the Court’s August 18 order, this action will be dismissed without prejudice for Plaintiff’s failure to prosecute the same. Civ. L. R. 41(c). Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that this action be and the same is hereby DISMISSED without prejudice for Plaintiff’s failure to prosecute. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment accordingly. Dated at Milwaukee, Wisconsin, this 28th day of August, 2017. BY THE COURT: J.P. Stadtmueller U.S. District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?