Tase-Soto v. Botello et al

Filing 5

ORDER signed by Judge J.P. Stadtmueller on 8/23/2017 DISMISSING CASE for Plaintiff's failure to prosecute. (cc: all counsel, via mail to Santos Tase-Soto)(jm)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
SANTOS TASE-SOTO,
Plaintiff,

v.

Case No. 17-CV-1052-JPS

JOSÉ BOTELLO, ROOSEVELT HOLT,
and MARTIN MEZEI,

ORDER

Defendants.
Plaintiff, Santos Tase-Soto, filed a pro se complaint alleging that
Defendants discriminated against him based on his age while at work.
(Docket #1). The Court dismissed his complaint in an order dated August
7, 2017, noting that Plaintiff failed to allege facts sufficient to state any
cognizable federal claims. (Docket #4). Plaintiff was afforded until August
21, 2017, to submit an amended complaint curing the deficiencies the Court
identified. Id. at 6–7. He was warned that failure to file an amended
complaint would result in dismissal of this action. Id. at 7. Nevertheless, the
August 21, 2017 deadline has passed and Plaintiff has filed nothing. As a
result, the Court will dismiss this action for Plaintiff’s failure to prosecute
the same. Civ. L. R. 41(c); Fischer v. Cingular Wireless, LLC, 446 F.3d 663, 665
(7th Cir. 2006).
Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED that this action be and the same is hereby
DISMISSED for Plaintiff’s failure to prosecute.
The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment accordingly.

Dated at Milwaukee, Wisconsin, this 23rd day of August, 2017.
BY THE COURT:

____________________________________
J. P. Stadtmueller
U.S. District Judge

Page 2 of 2