Kummer v. Blake Capital Corporation

Filing 8

ORDER signed by Judge Pamela Pepper on 8/28/2017 DENYING as moot 3 plaintiff's motion for TRO. (cc: all counsel, via mail to Michael A. Kummer) (cb)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN MICHAEL A. KUMMER, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 17-cv-1097-pp BLAKE CAPITAL CORPORATION d/b/a/ THE RIDGES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP Defendant. ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S EMERGENCY MOTION FOR AN EX PARTE TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDERAS MOOT (DKT. NO. 3) AND RETURNING CASE TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOSEPH FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS On August 9, 2017, the plaintiff filed a pro se complaint asking for an “emergency order from the Court (Rule 65 FRCP) against the Defendants commanding Defendants to STOP any further adverse action which impairs the Plaintiffs tenancy.” Dkt. No. 1 at 4. Because the plaintiff cited Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65, the clerk’s office re-docketed the complaint as an emergency motion for a temporary restraining order. Dkt. No. 3. A little over a week later, the plaintiff filed an amended complaint. Dkt. No. 6. The amended complaint seeks only monetary damages, and does not mention a request for relief under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65. Because the amended complaint supersedes his original complaint, there is no longer a motion for injunctive relief pending before the court. 1 The court DENIES AS MOOT the plaintiff’s motion for an emergency restraining order. Dkt. No. 3. The court REFERS the case back to Magistrate Judge Nancy Joseph for further proceedings. Dated in Milwaukee, Wisconsin this 28th day of August, 2017. BY THE COURT: _____________________________________ HON. PAMELA PEPPER United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?