Pliska v. Shawano County Jail et al

Filing 17

ORDER DISMISSING CASE without prejudice for failure to prosecute. (cc: all counsel and via US Mail to Jacob Pliska)(Griesbach, William)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN JACOB M. PLISKA, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 17-CV-1293 SHAWANO COUNTY JAIL, MD KEN ANOLIGO, CO PATTI, CHRIS REKOSKE, TYLOR RICH, and ODESSO CLAY, Defendants. ORDER The plaintiff, Jacob M. Pliska, is representing himself. On March 9, 2018, Magistrate Judge Nancy Joseph screened the second amended complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. For the reasons explained in the screening order, Judge Joseph determined that the second amended complaint was deficient and directed the plaintiff to file a third amended complaint by March 30, 2018, if he wanted to proceed with this case. (ECF No. 16 at 4-5.) The court also advised that failure to file a third amended complaint might result in dismissal of this action. The plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint. Based on the plaintiff’s failure to file a third amended complaint, it appears that he no longer wishes to prosecute this case. Therefore, the court will dismiss this case without prejudice. See Civil L.R. 41(c) (E.D. Wis.). This case was previously assigned to Magistrate Judge Joseph. However, because not all parties have had the opportunity to consent to magistrate judge jurisdiction, the case was reassigned to a District Judge for entry of this order dismissing the case. THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute. Dated at Green Bay, Wisconsin this 11th day of April, 2018. s/ William C. Griesbach William C. Griesbach, Chief Judge United States District Court - WIED -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?