Pliska v. Shawano County Jail et al
Filing
17
ORDER DISMISSING CASE without prejudice for failure to prosecute. (cc: all counsel and via US Mail to Jacob Pliska)(Griesbach, William)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
JACOB M. PLISKA,
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No. 17-CV-1293
SHAWANO COUNTY JAIL, MD KEN ANOLIGO,
CO PATTI, CHRIS REKOSKE, TYLOR RICH,
and ODESSO CLAY,
Defendants.
ORDER
The plaintiff, Jacob M. Pliska, is representing himself. On March 9, 2018, Magistrate Judge
Nancy Joseph screened the second amended complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. For the
reasons explained in the screening order, Judge Joseph determined that the second amended
complaint was deficient and directed the plaintiff to file a third amended complaint by March 30,
2018, if he wanted to proceed with this case. (ECF No. 16 at 4-5.) The court also advised that
failure to file a third amended complaint might result in dismissal of this action. The plaintiff has not
filed an amended complaint. Based on the plaintiff’s failure to file a third amended complaint, it
appears that he no longer wishes to prosecute this case. Therefore, the court will dismiss this case
without prejudice. See Civil L.R. 41(c) (E.D. Wis.).
This case was previously assigned to Magistrate Judge Joseph. However, because not all
parties have had the opportunity to consent to magistrate judge jurisdiction, the case was reassigned
to a District Judge for entry of this order dismissing the case.
THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED WITHOUT
PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute.
Dated at Green Bay, Wisconsin this
11th
day of April, 2018.
s/ William C. Griesbach
William C. Griesbach, Chief Judge
United States District Court - WIED
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?