Pietila v. Roper et al

Filing 18

ORDER signed by Judge J.P. Stadtmueller on 6/18/2018 DENYING 17 Plaintiff's Reply and Motion for Summary Judgment. (cc: all counsel, via mail to Michael Scott Pietila at Waupun Correctional Institution) (jm)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
MICHAEL SCOTT PIETILA,
Plaintiff,

Case No. 17-CV-1588-JPS-JPS

v.
GRANT ROPER, HUNTER HESS,
JACOB GRIPENTROG, JAMIE
MOUNGEY, CPT. KYLE TRITT, and
KYLE DEMERS,

ORDER

Defendants.
On May 16, 2018, Plaintiff filed a document entitled “Reply and
Motion for Summary Judgement [sic].” (Docket #17). It is neither. There is
no pending motion for Plaintiff to reply to, and the document comes
nowhere close to the requirements for a summary judgment filing. See Fed.
R. Civ. P. 56; Civ. L. R. 56. To the extent Plaintiff intended the document to
be a genuine motion, it must be denied.
Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s “Reply and Motion for Summary
Judgement [sic]” (Docket #17) be and the same is hereby DENIED.
Dated at Milwaukee, Wisconsin, this 18th day of June, 2018.
BY THE COURT:

____________________________________
J. P. Stadtmueller
U.S. District Judge