Engel v.Phenom Ingenious Brain et al

Filing 6

ORDER signed by Judge J.P. Stadtmueller on 3/12/2018. Plaintiff to PAY the $400.00 filing fee by 3/26/2018 or this action will be dismissed without further notice. (cc: all counsel, via mail to Dylan M. Engel)(jm)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN DYLAN M. ENGEL, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 18-CV-204-JPS PHENOM INGENIOUS BRAIN and BANK MUTUAL CREDIT, ORDER Defendants. Plaintiff Dylan M. Engel, proceeding pro se, filed a complaint in this matter and a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (Docket #1, #2). In an order dated February 15, 2018, the Court denied his motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and also dismissed his complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 for failure to state a viable claim for relief. (Docket #4 at 2, 6–7). The Court granted Plaintiff until March 8, 2018 to submit an amended motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and an amended complaint. Id. at 7. To date, Plaintiff has submitted only the second of these two documents. (Docket #5). Plaintiff apparently disregarded the Court’s direction about his motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Thus, as it warned Plaintiff in its last order, the Court will no longer entertain Plaintiff proceeding in forma pauperis and will instead direct him to pay the entire $400.00 filing fee for this action. (Docket #4 at 2). He must do so no later than March 26, 2018, or this action will be dismissed. Civ. L. R. 41(c); Fischer v. Cingular Wireless, LLC, 446 F.3d 663, 665 (7th Cir. 2006). Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff shall pay the $400.00 filing fee for this action no later than March 26, 2018. Failure to do so will result in dismissal of this action without further notice. Dated at Milwaukee, Wisconsin, this 12th day of March, 2018. BY THE COURT: ____________________________________ J. P. Stadtmueller U.S. District Judge Page 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?