Wilson v. Milwaukee County

Filing 14

ORDER signed by Judge J.P. Stadtmueller on 5/29/2018 DISMISSING CASE without prejudice for Plaintiff's failure to prosecute. (cc: all counsel, via mail to Derrick Alan Wilson, Jr.)(jm)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN DERRICK ALAN WILSON, JR., Plaintiff, v. MILWAUKEE COUNTY, Case No. 18-CV-241-JPS ORDER Defendant. Plaintiff, Derrick Alan Wilson, Jr. (“Wilson”), proceeding pro se, filed a complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging that his civil rights were violated. (Docket #1). The Court screened Wilson’s original complaint on February 28, 2018. (Docket #4). The Court identified numerous deficiencies in the complaint and ordered Wilson to submit an amended complaint. Id.; (Docket #6). Wilson submitted two amended complaints in rapid succession, (Docket #8, #9), leaving the Court to screen the later-filed of the two, (Docket #11 at 1). In screening the second amended complaint, the Court explained several lingering deficiencies in Wilson’s pleading. Id. at 5–7. The Court gave Wilson until May 15, 2018 to file a third amended complaint, and later extended that deadline to May 21, 2018. (Docket #13). The Court warned Wilson that if he did not file a third amended complaint by that deadline, his case would be dismissed without further notice. Id. at 2. The May 21 deadline has passed and the Court has not received a third amended complaint or any other communication from Wilson. Consequently, this action will be dismissed. Civ. L. R. 41(c); Fischer v. Cingular Wireless, LLC, 446 F.3d 663, 665 (7th Cir. 2006). Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that this action be and the same is hereby DISMISSED without prejudice for Plaintiff’s failure to prosecute. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment accordingly. Dated at Milwaukee, Wisconsin, this 29th day of May, 2018. BY THE COURT: ____________________________________ J. P. Stadtmueller U.S. District Judge Page 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?