Wilson v. Milwaukee County
Filing
14
ORDER signed by Judge J.P. Stadtmueller on 5/29/2018 DISMISSING CASE without prejudice for Plaintiff's failure to prosecute. (cc: all counsel, via mail to Derrick Alan Wilson, Jr.)(jm)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
DERRICK ALAN WILSON, JR.,
Plaintiff,
v.
MILWAUKEE COUNTY,
Case No. 18-CV-241-JPS
ORDER
Defendant.
Plaintiff, Derrick Alan Wilson, Jr. (“Wilson”), proceeding pro se, filed
a complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging that his civil rights were
violated. (Docket #1). The Court screened Wilson’s original complaint on
February 28, 2018. (Docket #4). The Court identified numerous deficiencies
in the complaint and ordered Wilson to submit an amended complaint. Id.;
(Docket #6). Wilson submitted two amended complaints in rapid
succession, (Docket #8, #9), leaving the Court to screen the later-filed of the
two, (Docket #11 at 1).
In screening the second amended complaint, the Court explained
several lingering deficiencies in Wilson’s pleading. Id. at 5–7. The Court
gave Wilson until May 15, 2018 to file a third amended complaint, and later
extended that deadline to May 21, 2018. (Docket #13). The Court warned
Wilson that if he did not file a third amended complaint by that deadline,
his case would be dismissed without further notice. Id. at 2. The May 21
deadline has passed and the Court has not received a third amended
complaint or any other communication from Wilson. Consequently, this
action will be dismissed. Civ. L. R. 41(c); Fischer v. Cingular Wireless, LLC,
446 F.3d 663, 665 (7th Cir. 2006).
Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED that this action be and the same is hereby
DISMISSED without prejudice for Plaintiff’s failure to prosecute.
The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment accordingly.
Dated at Milwaukee, Wisconsin, this 29th day of May, 2018.
BY THE COURT:
____________________________________
J. P. Stadtmueller
U.S. District Judge
Page 2 of 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?