Reed v. Common Bond LLC

Filing 40

ORDER signed by Judge Pamela Pepper on 5/10/2019 DENYING 37 plaintiff's letter motion to receive court documents via email. (cc: all counsel, via mail to Linda Reed) (cb)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN ______________________________________________________________________________ LINDA REED, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 18-cv-263-pp COMMON BOND, LLC. and COMMONBOND HOUSING, Defendant. ______________________________________________________________________________ ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S LETTER MOTION TO RECEIVE DOCUMENTS BY EMAIL (DKT. NO. 37) ______________________________________________________________________________ The court has received a letter from the plaintiff, asking that the court send her documents via email, rather than on paper, through the postal service. Dkt. No. 37. She says that seeing pages of papers with writing on both sides is “too much,” that she can’t comprehend that much information at one time and that she needs to break down information into portions that she can “work with and see.” Id. She indicates that email will help her with her organization. Id. The court will deny the plaintiff’s motion. The court regrets that the plaintiff struggles with comprehending information on paper. But with hundreds of cases and thousands of motions on the court’s docket, it cannot create a different rule for the plaintiff than it imposes on other parties who are representing themselves. If the plaintiff ever needs more time to understand the 1 documents the court sends, or to respond to deadlines, she may ask the court for additional time. The court DENIES the plaintiff’s letter motion to receive documents by email. Dkt. No. 37. Dated in Milwaukee, Wisconsin this 10th day of May, 2019. BY THE COURT: _________________________________ HON. PAMELA PEPPER United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?