United States of America v. Gorokhovsky et al
Filing
212
ORDER signed by Judge Brett H Ludwig on 12/14/21 denying as moot 198 Motion for Order to Show Cause; denying 200 Motion for Reconsideration ; granting 204 Motion to Withdraw ECF Nos. 202 and 203; denying as moot 207 Motion for Order. (cc:all counsel and mailed to pro se party)(MP)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
______________________________________________________________________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No. 18-cv-0590-bhl
VLADIMIR M GOROKHOVSKY, et al.,
Defendants.
______________________________________________________________________________
ORDER
______________________________________________________________________________
On September 1, 2020, Magistrate Judge William E. Duffin granted the United States’
motion for sanctions against Defendants Vladimir Gorokhovsky and Gorokhovsky Imports and
Investment Group LLC (GIIG). (ECF No. 142.) As part of that Order, Gorokhovsky and GIIG
were held jointly and severally liable for the costs and fees the United States incurred in preparing
and holding an August 4, 2020 deposition and in preparing its motion for sanctions. (Id. at 12.)
As of May 17, 2021, Gorokhovsky and GIIG had not paid those fees, so the United States filed a
motion requesting the Court set a deadline for payment. (ECF No. 176.) On September 7, 2021,
the Court granted the United States’ motion and directed Gorokhovsky and GIIG to pay the
outstanding fee awards on or before October 7, 2021. (ECF No. 192.) On October 6, 2021,
Gorokhovsky filed a motion for an extension of time to satisfy the outstanding sanctions order.
(ECF No. 193.) On October 12, 2021, the Court denied Gorokhovsky’s motion for want of good
cause. (ECF No. 197.)
On October 22, 2021, the United States filed a motion asking the Court to issue
Gorokhovsky and GIIG an order show cause why they should not be held in civil contempt for
failing to comply with the Court’s September 7, 2021 Order. (ECF No. 198.) The motion
contemplated the civil contempt sanction of default judgment against Gorokhovsky and GIIG.
(ECF No. 199 at 8.) Also on October 22, Gorokhovsky filed a motion for reconsideration of the
Court’s Order denying his motion for extension of time to comply with the September 7, 2021
Order. (ECF No. 200). Additionally, Gorokhovsky filed motions (ECF Nos. 202 & 203) seeking
Case 2:18-cv-00590-BHL Filed 12/14/21 Page 1 of 2 Document 212
to sanction the United States and its counsel for what he perceived to be malicious attacks on his
character contained in the brief supporting the motion for order to show cause at ECF No. 199.
But these malicious attacks turned out to be true, so Gorokhovsky filed a notice withdrawing his
motions for sanctions. (ECF No. 204.) A couple of weeks later, on November 9, 2021, the United
States filed a motion for an order directing Gorokhovsky to move to withdraw the motions he filed
at ECF Nos. 202 and 203. (ECF No. 207.)
On December 10, 2021, the Court entered an Order granting the United States’ motion for
summary judgment against Defendants Gorokhovsky, GIIG, and Larissa Ocheretner. (ECF No.
211.) Thus, it is time to dispose of the multitude of miscellaneous pending motions.
As to Gorokhovsky’s pending motion for reconsideration (ECF No. 200), if there was no
good cause for failure to pay sanctions on October 6, 2021, there is certainly none on December
14. Accordingly, the motion for reconsideration will be denied. The United States’ motion for an
order to show cause (ECF No. 198) will be denied as moot following this Court’s December 10,
2021 Order granting the United States’ motion for summary judgment against Gorokhovsky and
GIIG. (ECF No. 211.) And the Court will accept Gorokhovsky’s notice of withdrawal (ECF No.
204) as a motion to withdraw his motions made at ECF Nos. 202 and 203. That motion will be
granted, and the United States’ motion for an order directing Gorokhovsky to file a motion
withdrawing those motions will be denied as moot.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion for Reconsideration (ECF No.
200) is DENIED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Order to Show Cause (ECF
No. 198) is DENIED as moot.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion to Withdraw Motions Filed at
ECF Nos. 202 and 203 (ECF No. 204) is GRANTED, and the motions are withdrawn.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Order Directing Defendant to
Move to Withdraw Motions Filed at ECF Nos. 202 and 203 (ECF No. 207) is DENIED as moot.
Dated at Milwaukee, Wisconsin on December 14, 2021.
s/ Brett H. Ludwig
BRETT H. LUDWIG
United States District Judge
Case 2:18-cv-00590-BHL Filed 12/14/21 Page 2 of 2 Document 212
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?