Coleman et al v. Speedway LLC et al

Filing 21

ORDER signed by Judge J.P. Stadtmueller on 8/10/2018: GRANTING 18 Involuntary Plaintiff Wisconsin Department of Health Services' Motion to Dismiss and DISMISSING Wisconsin Department of Health Services from this action with prejudice. (cc: all counsel, via mail to Eric Coleman)(jm)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN ERIC COLEMAN, Plaintiff, Case No. 18-CV-636-JPS v. COMPCARE HEALTH SERVICES INSURANCE CORPORATION, WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES, MOLINA HEALTHCARE OF WISCONSIN INC., and HOME DEPOT WELFARE BENEFITS PLAN, v. Involuntary Plaintiffs, ORDER SPEEDWAY LLC and ABC INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendants. On July 18, 2018, involuntary plaintiff Wisconsin Department of Health Services (“WDHS”) filed a motion to voluntarily dismiss its claim in this action with prejudice and without costs. (Docket #18). WDHS was named in this lawsuit because it has a subrogated interest for payment of medical expenses of the plaintiff, Eric Coleman. Id. at 1. WDHS explains that it has determined the medical expenses it paid are below its established threshold to pursue recovery, and therefore it requests an order dismissing it from this action. Id. WDHS agrees to release and discharge its subrogation lien resulting from a claim under Wisconsin Statutes section 49.89(2). Id. In light of the foregoing, and without objection from any other party, the Court will grant WDHS’ motion to dismiss. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2). Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that involuntary plaintiff Wisconsin Department of Health Services’ motion to dismiss (Docket #18) be and the same is hereby GRANTED; Wisconsin Department of Health Services be and the same is hereby DISMISSED from this action with prejudice. Dated at Milwaukee, Wisconsin, this 10th day of August, 2018. BY THE COURT: J.P. Stadtmueller U.S. District Judge Page 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?