King v. Schmaling et al
Filing
212
ORDER GRANTING 211 Motion for Leave for Defendant Navarro to Appear Remotely at Trial, signed by Judge William C Griesbach on 03/20/2024. Navarros counsel is responsible for making arrangements with the Courts IT staff to ensure Navarro is able to appear by contemporaneous transmission at the appointed time. SEE ORDER FOR FULL DETAIL. (cc: all counsel)(Griesbach, William)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
RYAN KING,
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No. 18-C-744
CRISTINA DEJESUS, et al.,
Defendants.
DECISION AND ORDER
Plaintiff Ryan King is proceeding on Fourteenth Amendment claims in connection with
Defendants’ responses to his complaint about an earplug being lodged deep in his ear. A jury trial
is set to begin on March 25, 2024. On March 18, 2024, Defendant Kendra Navarro, through her
attorneys, moved for an order allowing her to testify by contemporaneous transmission, i.e., Zoom
or the equivalent, from a different location. Plaintiff does not oppose the motion.
Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 43(a), “[f]or good cause in compelling circumstances and with
appropriate safeguards, the court may permit testimony in open court by contemporaneous
transmission from a different location.” Navarro explains that she recently relocated with her
family to Tennessee and that it would cause her extreme and undue financial hardship to travel to
Wisconsin to testify in person. Counsel anticipates that her testimony will last less than an hour.
Based on the foregoing, the Court concludes that Navarro has shown good cause in compelling
circumstances for testifying contemporaneously from a different location. Accordingly, the Court
will grant her motion.
Navarro’s counsel is responsible for making arrangements with the Court’s IT staff to
ensure Navarro is able to appear by contemporaneous transmission at the appointed time. Navarro
should testify as though she is on the witness stand, meaning she should not refer to any electronic
or paper documents unless the Court allows her to do so. Counsel should ensure that Navarro has
access to copies of the exhibits that may be reviewed during her testimony, and, to the extent
Counsel seeks to publish exhibits, that the jury is able to see both Navarro and the published
exhibit.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Navarro’s motion for remote trial testimony (Dkt.
No. 211) is GRANTED.
Dated at Green Bay, Wisconsin this 20th day of March, 2024.
s/ William C. Griesbach
William C. Griesbach
United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?