Gregg v. Berryhill

Filing 21

ORDER signed by Judge Pamela Pepper on 2/28/2019. 20 Joint stipulation APPROVED, motion to remand GRANTED. Commissioner's denial of benefits REVERSED, case REMANDED to Commissioner for further proceedings under Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. §405(g). (cc: all counsel)(cb)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN LISA GREGG, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 18-cv-766-pp NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration Defendant. ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION AND GRANTING MOTION FOR REMAND (DKT. NO. 20) AND REMANDING CASE FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS UNDER SENTENCE FOUR OF 42. U.S.C. §405(g) On February 27, 2019, the parties filed a joint stipulation and motion for remand for further proceedings pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. §405(g). Dkt. No. 20. The court APPROVES the stipulation, GRANTS the motion for remand and ORDERS that: The case is REMANDED to the Commissioner of Social Security. On judicial remand, an Administrative Law Judge will offer the Plaintiff the opportunity for a hearing where she may testify and submit additional arguments and evidence. The ALJ will take further action to complete the administrative record. The ALJ will reevaluate the record, including reevaluation of opinion evidence. The ALJ will reevaluate the intensity, persistence, and functionally limiting effects of Plaintiff's symptoms 1 consistent with the applicable rules and regulations. The ALJ will proceed through the sequential evaluation process as needed reach a decision. If the evaluation reaches step four, the ALJ will reevaluate Plaintiff's residual functional capacity, and the ALJ will obtain vocational testimony as needed to support a decision consistent with the applicable rules and regulations. The ALJ will issue a de novo decision. Dated in Milwaukee, Wisconsin this 28th day of February, 2019. BY THE COURT: _____________________________________ HON. PAMELA PEPPER United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?